Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32555612›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Sex-specific vagal and spinal modulation of breathing with chest compression.

Alyssa Huff, Mitchell D Reed, Kimberly E Iceman, Dena R Howland, Teresa Pitts

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Serotonin therapies for opioid-induced disordered swallow and respiratory depression.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Spinal muscular atrophy: Broad disease spectrum and sex-specific phenotypes.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alyssa HuffDepartment of Physiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States of America.
Mitchell D ReedDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States of America.
Kimberly E IcemanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States of America.
Dena R HowlandDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States of America.
Teresa PittsDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9448-2175
University of Louisville · US

Funding

Functional mapping of peripheral and central circuits for airway protection and breathingOT2OD023854 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BOLSER, DONALD C · 2016 to 2020
$10.8M
Regulation of swallow and the effects of high cervical spinal cord injuryR01NS110169 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI PITTS, TERESA G · 2019 to 2023
$1.7M
NIH HHS OT2 OD023854NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung volume is modulated by sensory afferent feedback via vagal and spinal pathways. The purpose of this study was to systematically alter afferent feedback with and without a mechanical challenge (chest compression). We hypothesized that manipulation of afferent feedback by nebulization of lidocaine, extra-thoracic vagotomy, or lidocaine administration to the pleural space would produce differential effects on the motor pattern of breathing during chest compression in sodium pentobarbital anesthetized rats (N = 43). Our results suggest that: 1) pulmonary stretch receptors are not the sole contributor to breathing feedback in adult male and female rats; 2) of our manipulations, chest compression had the largest effect on early expiratory diaphragm activity ("yield"); 3) reduction of spinally-mediated afferent feedback modulates breathing patterns most likely via inhibition; and 4) breathing parameters demonstrate large sex differences. Compared to males, female animals had lower respiratory rates (RR), which were further depressed by vagotomy, while chest compression increased RR in males, and decreased yield in females without changing RR. Collectively, our results suggest that balance between tonic vagal inhibition and spinal afferent feedback maintains breathing characteristics, and that it is important to specifically evaluate sex differences when studying control of breathing.

Indexed as

RespirationAfferent PathwaysAnimalsCardiopulmonary ResuscitationFemaleLidocaineMaleNebulizers and VaporizersRats, Sprague-DawleySex FactorsVagotomyVagus NerveLidocaine

Identifiers

PMID32555612
PMCPMC7299359
OpenAlexW3036025042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.