Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32555559›Full record

ArticleOncology nursing forum2020

The Ecology of Patients' Sexual Health Adjustment After Prostate Cancer Treatment: The Influence of the Social and Healthcare Environment.

Asa Smith, Daniela Wittmann, Denise Saint Arnault

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology nursing forum, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Asa SmithUniversity of Michigan.
Daniela WittmannUniversity of Michigan.
Denise Saint ArnaultUniversity of Michigan.

Funding

Advanced Training in Self-Management Interventions for Serious Chronic ConditionsT32NR018407 · NINR · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI KNOPF, AMELIA S, MILLER, WENDY RENEE · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
NINR NIH HHS T32 NR018407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLittle empirical research identifies environmental influences on sexual recovery of men with prostate cancer. This secondary qualitative analysis aimed to describe the role of the patients' environment on their sexual recovery process following prostate cancer surgery. PARTICIPANTS &

settingTranscripts of interviews with 8 heterosexual men were randomly selected and analyzed from a sample of 18 at three months postprostatectomy. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: The study was based on the social ecological model. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was applied to examine environmental factors affecting sexual recovery through the participant's perspective.

findingsThe value of trusted connections and support extended beyond the partner to the patient's social and healthcare networks. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: These findings support the need for providers to assess the full constellation of patients' environmental experiences to better understand sexual recovery.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalSexual HealthAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsQuality of LifeSexual BehaviorSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSurveys and Questionnairesphenomenologyprostate cancerprostatectomysexual healthsexual recovery

Identifiers

PMID32555559
PMCPMC8103819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.