Black lives in urology: addressing the bias and redressing the balance.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Promoting diversity and equality across surgical specialties.Nature reviews. Urology · 2022
   Article
2. The relationship between Black men with prostate cancer and their health-care providers.Nature reviews. Urology · 2021
   Article
3. Virtual "matchmaking" without visiting electives: Overview of the early U.S. experience and potential applications to the 2021 Canadian urology match.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021
   Article
4. Supporting Black voices in urology.Nature reviews. Urology · 2021
   Article
5. Fighting the 'other pandemic' - systemic racism in urology.Nature reviews. Urology · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Promoting diversity and equality across surgical specialties.2022

Authors and funding

0 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as