Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32555340›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2020

The human motor cortex microcircuit: insights for neurodegenerative disease.

Peter McColgan, Julie Joubert, Sarah J Tabrizi, Geraint Rees

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter McColganHuntington's Disease Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK. p.mccolgan@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5452-0648
Julie JoubertHuntington's Disease Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Sarah J TabriziHuntington's Disease Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2716-2045
Geraint ReesWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9623-7007
Huntington's Disease Association · GBWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Department of HealthWellcome Trust 200181/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human motor cortex comprises a microcircuit of five interconnected layers with different cell types. In this Review, we use a layer-specific and cell-specific approach to integrate physiological accounts of this motor cortex microcircuit with the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases affecting motor functions. In doing so we can begin to link motor microcircuit pathology to specific disease stages and clinical phenotypes. Based on microcircuit physiology, we can make future predictions of axonal loss and microcircuit dysfunction. With recent advances in high-resolution neuroimaging we can then test these predictions in humans in vivo, providing mechanistic insights into neurodegenerative disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMotor CortexNeural PathwaysNeurodegenerative Diseases

Identifiers

PMID32555340
OpenAlexW3036081205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.