Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32555232›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Comparison of host immune responses to LPS in human using an immune profiling panel, in vivo endotoxemia versus ex vivo stimulation.

Dina M Tawfik, Jacqueline M Lankelma, Laurence Vachot, Elisabeth Cerrato, Alexandre Pachot, W Joost Wiersinga, Julien Textoris

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Biomedicines · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Impaired Responses to In Vitro Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Stimulation After Long-Term, Rotating Shift Work.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Ablation ofiScience · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Lentinan and β-glucan extract from shiitake mushroom,Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Dina M TawfikEA7426 "Pathophysiology of Injury-Induced Immunosuppression", PI3, Université Claude Bernard Lyon-1 Hospices Civils de Lyon - bioMérieux, Lyon, France.
Jacqueline M LankelmaCenter for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Laurence VachotOpen Innovation and Partnerships (OIP), bioMérieux S.A, Lyon, France.
Elisabeth CerratoOpen Innovation and Partnerships (OIP), bioMérieux S.A, Lyon, France.
Alexandre PachotDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
W Joost WiersingaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Julien TextorisOpen Innovation and Partnerships (OIP), bioMérieux S.A, Lyon, France. julien.textoris@biomerieux.com.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLHospices Civils de Lyon · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients that suffer from sepsis exhibit an early hyper-inflammatory immune response which can lead to organ failure and death. In our study, we assessed the immune modulation in the human in vivo endotoxemia model and compared it to ex vivo LPS stimulation using 38 transcriptomic markers. Blood was collected before and after 4 hours of LPS challenge and tested with the Immune Profiling Panel (IPP) using the FilmArray system. The use of IPP showed that markers from the innate immunity dominated the response to LPS in vivo, mainly markers related to monocytes and neutrophils. Comparing the two models, in vivo and ex vivo, revealed that most of the markers were modulated in a similar pattern (68%). Some cytokine markers such as TNF, IFN-γ and IL-1β were under-expressed ex vivo compared to in vivo. T-cell markers were either unchanged or up-modulated ex vivo, compared to a down-modulation in vivo. Interestingly, markers related to neutrophils were expressed in opposite directions, which might be due to the presence of cell recruitment and feedback loops in vivo. The IPP tool was able to capture the early immune response in both the human in vivo endotoxemia model, a translational model mimicking the immune response observed in septic patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBiomarkersEndotoxemiaFemaleHumansImmunity, InnateLipopolysaccharidesMaleMiddle AgedMonocytesTranscriptomeYoung AdultBiomarkersLipopolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID32555232
PMCPMC7303162
OpenAlexW3035923772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.