Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32555225›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Assessing morphological congruence in Dinobryon species and their stomatocysts, including a newly established Dinobryon pediforme-stomatocyst connection.

Jolanta Piątek, Joanna Lenarczyk, Marcin Piątek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jolanta PiątekDepartment of Phycology, W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lubicz 46, PL-31-512, Kraków, Poland. j.piatek@botany.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3707-8966
Joanna LenarczykDepartment of Phycology, W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lubicz 46, PL-31-512, Kraków, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8909-7053
Marcin PiątekDepartment of Mycology, W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lubicz 46, PL-31-512, Kraków, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4968-2861

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chrysophyte genus Dinobryon Ehrenberg consists of 44 taxa, which occur in freshwaters, rarely marine waters, mostly in temperate regions of the world. The taxa of Dinobryon produce characteristic solitary or dendroid colonies and resting stages called stomatocysts. Only 20 Dinobryon taxa have information on produced stomatocysts and only four stomatocysts are reliably linked with vegetative stages using modern identification standards employing scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses. In this study, an encysted material of Dinobryon pediforme (Lemmermann) Steinecke was collected in two lakes in contrasting regions of Poland. Light microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses revealed that Dinobryon pediforme produces stomatocyst #61, Piątek J. that is described here as new morphotype following the International Statospore Working Group (ISWG) guidelines. This raises to five the number of reliable links between vegetative stages of Dinobryon species and corresponding stomatocysts. Phenotypic similarities between Dinobryon species and their stomatocysts, analysed for five reliably established links, showed no relationships in size and shape between loricas and stomatocysts belonging to the same species. The morphological characters of loricas and stomatocysts mapped onto the phylogenetic tree of the five Dinobryon species revealed only little congruence between their morphology and phylogenetic relationships.

Indexed as

ChrysophytaMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningPhylogenyPolandSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID32555225
PMCPMC7300117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.