Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32555144›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2020

Daily estimates of clinical severity of symptoms in bipolar disorder from smartphone-based self-assessments.

Jonas Busk, Maria Faurholt-Jepsen, Mads Frost, Jakob E Bardram, Lars Vedel Kessing, Ole Winther

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Precision Psychiatry: The Future Is Now.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonas BuskDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark. jbusk@dtu.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2502-1679
Maria Faurholt-JepsenCopenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center (CADIC), Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mads FrostMonsenso ApS, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jakob E BardramDepartment of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Lars Vedel KessingCopenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center (CADIC), Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ole WintherDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.

Funding

Innovationsfonden (Innovation Fund Denmark) 5164-00001B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, the golden standard for assessing the severity of depressive and manic symptoms in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) is clinical evaluations using validated rating scales such as the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-items (HDRS) and the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). Frequent automatic estimation of symptom severity could potentially help support monitoring of illness activity and allow for early treatment intervention between outpatient visits. The present study aimed (1) to assess the feasibility of producing daily estimates of clinical rating scores based on smartphone-based self-assessments of symptoms collected from a group of patients with BD; (2) to demonstrate how these estimates can be utilized to compute individual daily risk of relapse scores. Based on a total of 280 clinical ratings collected from 84 patients with BD along with daily smartphone-based self-assessments, we applied a hierarchical Bayesian modelling approach capable of providing individual estimates while learning characteristics of the patient population. The proposed method was compared to common baseline methods. The model concerning depression severity achieved a mean predicted R

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderAffectBayes TheoremHumansPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSelf-AssessmentSmartphone

Identifiers

PMID32555144
PMCPMC7303106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.