ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2020
The coccygeal pressure ulcer-does coccygectomy prevent recurrence?
Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designThis is a retrospective, non-randomized cohort study, with data collected during the regular annual visits between 2001 and 2019.
objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of coccygectomy for coccygeal pressure ulcers in individuals with paraplegia due to spinal cord injury or other neurological causes and to evaluate its role in the prophylaxis of ulcer recurrence. SETTINGS: This study included inpatients and outpatients with a coccygeal pressure ulcer who were treated surgically at our Institution REHAB Basel and were followed with regular annual check-ups.
methodsIndividuals with category 3 or 4 acute or chronic coccygeal pressure ulcer (classification according European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP)) received coccygectomy in addition to rotation flap surgery. The operative care was provided exclusively by the head of the plastic surgery department at REHAB Basel. Standardized follow-up treatment was carried out according to the "Basel Decubitus Concept" and thus allowed continuous and usually lifelong, regular follow-up care.
resultsForty-nine individuals underwent coccygectomy from 2001 to 2019 due to coccygeal category 3 or 4 pressure ulcers. The observation period was between 1.5 and 18.3 years. In 86% of the individuals, no relapse occurred during the first year. Over the next 5 years 78% remained relapse free.
conclusionsIn coccygeal pressure ulcer category 3 or 4, coccygectomy, in addition to sufficient rotation flap surgery, is a suitable method for recurrence prevention of pressure ulcer in this anatomic area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.