SynthesisAmerican journal of clinical oncology2020
Effectiveness and Safety of Reirradiation With Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy of Lung Cancer After a First Course of Thoracic Radiation: A Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in American journal of clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reirradiation With Proton Therapy Using Hypofractionated Schedules: A Systematic Review of the Literature.International journal of particle therapy · 2026Review
- Landmark-guided deformable image registration for accurate cumulative dose evaluation in lung reirradiation.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Re-irradiation of recurrent lung tumours: Associations between dose and 2-year survival.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- Reirradiation - still navigating uncharted waters?Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024Review
- STRILL: Phase I Trial Evaluating Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Dose Escalation for Re-Irradiation of Inoperable Peripheral Lung Lesions.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Salvage percutaneous high-dose-rate brachyablation after stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of Robotic Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Patients Undergoing Re-irradiation: A Review.Cureus · 2023Review
- Stereotactic body proton therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical indications and recommendations.Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT · 2023Article
- Safety and efficacy of stereotactic body proton therapy for high-risk lung tumors.Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT · 2023Article
- Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of surgically ineligible stage I non-small cell lung cancer in the Brazilian public health system.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2022Article
- High Dose Thoracic Re-Irradiation and Chemo-Immunotherapy for Centrally Recurrent NSCLC.Cancers · 2022Review
- Long Term Results of Single-Fraction Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2020Article
- Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Reirradiation Is Safe in Patients With Lung Cancer With In-Field Enlarged Tumor Recurrence.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe effectiveness and safety of reirradiation with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (re-SABR) in patients with recurrence after a previous course of radiation are limited to small series. We carried out a meta-analysis to summarize existing data and identify trends in overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and toxicity after re-SABR in patients with recurrence of lung cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsEligible studies were identified on Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the proceedings of annual meetings through June 2019. We followed the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. A meta-regression analysis was carried out to assess whether there is a relationship between moderator variables and outcomes. A P-value<0.05 was considered significant.
resultsTwenty observational studies with a total of 595 patients treated were included. The 2-year OS and LC were 0.54 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-0.61) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.66-0.80), respectively. The rate of any toxicity grade ≥3 was 0.098 (95% CI: 0.06-13.6), with 9 grade 5 toxicity (1.5%). In the meta-regression, the re-SABR dose (P=0.028), tumor size (P=0.031), and time to recurrence (P=0.018) showed an association with survival. For LC, the re-SABR dose (P=0.034) and tumor size (P=0.040) were statistically significant. Any toxicity grade ≥3 showed a relationship with the cumulative dose (P=0.024). Cumulative dose ≤145 versus >145 Gy2 had 3% versus 15% (P=0.013) of any grade ≥3 toxicity.
conclusionsRe-SABR produces satisfactory LC and OS rates with an acceptable rate of toxicity. The balancing between the re-SABR dose and the tumor location has the potential to reduce severe and fatal toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32554982What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.