Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32554839›Full record

ReviewJournal of behavioral addictions2020

The Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling: A revised framework for understanding gambling harm.

Margo Hilbrecht, David Baxter, Max Abbott, Per Binde, Luke Clark, David C Hodgins, Darrel Manitowabi, Lena Quilty, Jessika SpÅngberg, Rachel Volberg and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. 'I Battle With This Gambling Addiction Every Day'. Learning From Lived Experiences of Recovery to Guide Gambling Harm Prevention Strategies.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Margo Hilbrecht1Gambling Research Exchange, Guelph, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7615-7595
David Baxter1Gambling Research Exchange, Guelph, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5235-6728
Max Abbott3Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Per Binde4School of Global Studies, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Luke Clark5Centre for Gambling Research at UBC, Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1103-2422
David C Hodgins6Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2737-5200
Darrel Manitowabi7School of Northern and Community Studies, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada.
Lena Quilty8Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jessika SpÅngberg10Public Health Agency of Sweden, Östersund, Sweden.
Rachel Volberg11School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2959-0748
Douglas Walker12Department of Economics, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2298-3485
Robert J Williams13Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9558-9588

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling moves beyond a symptoms-based view of harm and addresses a broad set of factors related to the risks and effects of gambling harmfully at the individual, family, and community levels. Coauthored by international research experts and informed by multiple stakeholders, Gambling Research Exchange (GREO) facilitated the framework development in 2013 and retains responsibility for regular updates and mobilization. This review article presents information about the revised version of the Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling completed in late 2018.

methodsWe describe eight interrelated factors depicted in the framework that represent major themes in gambling ranging from the specific (gambling environment, exposure, gambling types, and treatment resources) to the general (cultural, social, psychological, and biological influences). After outlining the framework development and collaborative process, we highlight new topics for the recent update that reflect changes in the gambling landscape and prominent discourses in the scientific community. Some of these topics include social and economic impacts of gambling, and a new model of understanding gambling related harm. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsWe address the relevance of the CFHG to the gambling and behavioral addictions research community. Harm-based frameworks have been undertaken in other areas of addiction that can both inform and be informed by a model dedicated to harmful gambling. Further, the framework brings a multi-disciplinary perspective to bear on antecedents and factors that co-occur with harmful gambling.

Indexed as

GamblingModels, TheoreticalPublic HealthSocial Determinants of HealthHumansInterdisciplinary Researchconceptual frameworkharmful gamblingharmful gambling antecedentsinterdisciplinaritypublic healthsocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID32554839
PMCPMC8939413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.