Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32554780›Full record

ArticleGenome research2020

The evolution of sex-biased gene expression in the

Samuel Khodursky, Nicolas Svetec, Sylvia M Durkin, Li Zhao

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Organization and evolution of sex-biased gene expression inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Sex-specific viability effects of mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samuel Khodursky *Laboratory of Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5024-4773
Nicolas Svetec *Laboratory of Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9617-2752
Sylvia M DurkinLaboratory of Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7290-7336
Li ZhaoLaboratory of Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6776-1996
Rockefeller University · US

Funding

The genetic and epigenetic mechanisms of phenotypic innovationhttps://apps.era.nih.gov/gm/reportCheckList.do?applicationID=9798249R35GM133780 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI Li Zhao · 2019 to 2026
$3.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genes with sex-biased expression in

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGene Expression RegulationAnimalsBrainComputational BiologyDNA, IntergenicDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEvolution, MolecularFemaleGenes, X-LinkedMaleOrgan SpecificitySex FactorsX ChromosomeDNA, IntergenicDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32554780
PMCPMC7370887
OpenAlexW3036050606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.