Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32554735›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Non-absorbable versus absorbable sutures for anterior colporrhaphy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in South Korea.

Myung Jae Jeon, Dong Hoon Suh, Chul Hong Kim, Hyun-Hee Cho, Jung-Ho Shin, Sa Ra Lee, Yong Wook Jung, Soo Rim Kim, Mi Kyung Kong

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03736811 (Nonabsorbable Versus Absorbable Sutures for Anterior Colporrhaphy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03736811 naunknown statusnot on this map

Nonabsorbable Versus Absorbable Sutures for Anterior Colporrhaphy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeoul National University HospitalRan2018 to 2023Enrolled196ConditionsPelvic Organ ProlapseArmsPolyglactin 910 or polydioxanone, Polyester or polypropylene
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Myung Jae JeonObstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, The Republic of Korea jeonmj@snu.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0001-5582-1488
Dong Hoon SuhObstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, The Republic of Korea.
Chul Hong KimObstetrics and Gynecology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, The Republic of Korea.
Hyun-Hee ChoObstetrics and Gynecology, The Catholic University of Korea, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, The Republic of Korea.
Jung-Ho ShinObstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, The Republic of Korea.
Sa Ra LeeObstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, The Republic of Korea.
Yong Wook JungObstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University College of Medicine, Seoul, The Republic of Korea.
Soo Rim KimObstetrics and Gynecology, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, The Republic of Korea.
Mi Kyung KongObstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, The Republic of Korea.
Seoul National University · KRUlsan College · KRCatholic University of Korea · KRCHA University · KRChonnam National University Hospital · KRKorea University · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe anterior vaginal wall is the segment most commonly affected by prolapse. Traditionally, anterior vaginal wall prolapse is repaired via anterior colporrhaphy, which is known to have a high recurrence rate. Several factors might affect the outcome of anterior colporrhaphy, and the use of absorbable sutures might also be associated with the high recurrence rate because the sutures might not be able to retain adequate strength until the plicated pubocervical fascia remodels and regains maximum tensile strength. Nonetheless, no comparative data exist about the relative efficacy and safety of anterior colporrhaphy using non-absorbable versus absorbable sutures. The objective of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of anterior colporrhaphy using non-absorbable sutures with those of anterior colporrhaphy using absorbable sutures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a randomised, multicentre, superiority trial. Anterior colporrhaphy will be performed in a traditional manner with midline plication of the fibromuscular layer using either non-absorbable or absorbable sutures. The primary outcome is composite surgical success 1 year after surgery defined as the absence of all of the following: (1) anterior vaginal descent beyond the hymen, (2) the presence of vaginal bulge symptoms and (3) retreatment for recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse with either surgery or pessary. The secondary outcomes include the individual components of the composite primary end point, anatomical outcomes, condition-specific quality of life and adverse events related to anterior colporrhaphy. The planned number of participants is 192. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Hospital (H-1810-037-977). The results of the study will be published in peer-reviewed journals, and the findings will be presented at scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03736811.

Indexed as

SuturesEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPelvic Organ ProlapseRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRepublic of KoreaResearch DesignTensile StrengthVaginaanterior colporrhaphyanterior vaginal wall prolapsesutures

Identifiers

PMID32554735
PMCPMC7304798
OpenAlexW3035898615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.