ReviewBMJ open quality2020
Processes and tools to improve teamwork and communication in surgical settings: a narrative review.
Review in BMJ open quality, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Communication Practices in Surgical Settings: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Providers and patient Caregivers in Coastal Karnataka.Health services insights · 2026Article
- Viewing patient safety in surgery through the lens of a theatrical performance: a narrative review.Patient safety in surgery · 2025Review
- Failure to Rescue and Lung Resections for Lung Cancer: Measuring Quality from the Operation Room to the Intensive Care Unit.Cancers · 2025Review
- The Orthopaedic Instrumentation Nomenclature Know-how (OINK) study.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Optimizing Teamwork in the Operating Room: A Scoping Review of Actionable Teamwork Strategies.Cureus · 2024Article
- Improving the impact of pharmacy interventions in hospitals.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
- Improving teamwork and communication in the operating room by introducing the theatre cap challenge.Journal of perioperative practice · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.