Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32554440›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based mental health2020

Real-world effect of antidepressants for depressive disorder in primary care: protocol of a population-based cohort study.

Franco De Crescenzo, Cesar Garriga, Anneka Tomlinson, Carol Coupland, Orestis Efthimiou, Seena Fazel, Julia Hippisley-Cox, Andrea Cipriani

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based mental health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Polypharmacy and antidepressant acceptability in comorbid depression and type 2 diabetes: a cohort study using UK primary care data.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Franco De CrescenzoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK franco.decrescenzo@psych.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2478-7763
Cesar GarrigaNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7073-3611
Anneka TomlinsonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Carol CouplandDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Orestis EfthimiouInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0955-7572
Seena FazelDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Julia Hippisley-CoxNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Andrea CiprianiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5179-8321
University of Oxford · GBOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-2017-08-ST2-006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionClinical guidelines recommend antidepressants as the first line of treatment for adults with moderate-to-severe depression. Randomised trials provide the best evidence on the comparative effectiveness of antidepressants for depression, but are limited by a short follow-up and a highly selected population. We aim to conduct a cohort study on a large database to assess acceptability, efficacy, safety and tolerability of antidepressant monotherapy in people with depressive disorder in primary care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a protocol for a cohort study using data from the QResearch primary care research database, which is the largest general practice research database in the UK. We will include patients registered for at least 1 year from 1 January 1998, diagnosed with a new episode of depression and on antidepressant and a comparison group not on antidepressant. The exposure of interest will be treatment with antidepressant medications. Our outcomes will be acceptability (treatment discontinuation due to any cause), efficacy (clinical response and remission); safety (adverse events (AEs) and all-cause mortality); and tolerability (dropouts due to any AE) measured at 2 months, 6 months and 1 year. For each outcome, we will estimate the absolute risks for all antidepressants, and relative effects between antidepressants using Cox's proportion hazards models. We will calculate HRs and 99.9% CIs for each outcome of interest. DISCUSSION: The main limitation is the observational nature of our study, while the major strengths include the large representative population contained in QResearch and the possibly high generalisability.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsDepressive DisorderOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultCohort StudiesHumansMortalityObservational Studies as TopicPatient DropoutsPrimary Health CareProportional Hazards ModelsRemission InductionAntidepressive Agentsadult psychiatrydepression & mood disorders

Identifiers

PMID32554440
PMCPMC10231559
OpenAlexW3036433965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.