Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32554378›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020

Review and Selection of Online Resources for Carers of Frail Adults or Older People in Five European Countries: Mixed-Methods Study.

Roberta Papa, Areti Efthymiou, Giovanni Lamura, Flavia Piccinini, Giulia Onorati, Evridiki Papastavrou, Theologia Tsitsi, Giulia Casu, Licia Boccaletti, Alessandra Manattini and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Roberta PapaCentre for Socio-Economic Research on Ageing, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3827-5918
Areti EfthymiouDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0001-8838-1669
Giovanni LamuraCentre for Socio-Economic Research on Ageing, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9278-9544
Flavia PiccininiCentre for Socio-Economic Research on Ageing, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3484-0310
Giulia OnoratiCentre for Socio-Economic Research on Ageing, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7385-6796
Evridiki PapastavrouDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0001-5128-3651
Theologia TsitsiDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0001-8515-5228
Giulia CasuDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5441-3044
Licia BoccalettiAnziani e Non Solo - social cooperative, Carpi, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0332-1945
Alessandra ManattiniAnziani e Non Solo - social cooperative, Carpi, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8079-0505
Rita SenecaAnziani e Non Solo - social cooperative, Carpi, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4504-3090
Carlos Vaz de CarvalhoVirtual Campus, Lda, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6587-5893
Rita DurãoVirtual Campus, Lda, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2420-9023
Francesco BarbabellaCentre for Socio-Economic Research on Ageing, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1497-0011
Frida AndréassonDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6438-8575
Lennart MagnussonDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2028-6213
Elizabeth HansonDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7609-4822

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformal carers have a crucial role in the care of older people, but they are at risk of social isolation and psychological exhaustion. Web-based services like apps and websites are increasingly used to support informal carers in addressing some of their needs and tasks, such as health monitoring of their loved ones, information and communication, and stress management. Despite the growing number of available solutions, the lack of knowledge or skills of carers about the solutions often prevent their usage.

objectiveThis study aimed to review and select apps and websites offering functionalities useful for informal carers of frail adults or older people in 5 European countries (Cyprus, Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Sweden).

methodsA systematic online search was conducted from January 2017 to mid-March 2017 using selected keywords, followed by an assessment based on a set of commonly agreed criteria and standardized tools. Selected resources were rated and classified in terms of scope. Focus groups with informal carers were conducted to validate the list and the classification of resources. The activities were conducted in parallel in the participating countries using common protocols and guidelines, a standardization process, and scheduled group discussions.

resultsFrom a total of 406 eligible resources retrieved, 138 apps and 86 websites met the inclusion criteria. Half of the selected resources (109/224, 48.7%) were disease-specific, and the remaining resources included information and utilities on a variety of themes. Only 38 resources (38/224, 17.0%) were devoted specifically to carers, addressing the management of health disturbances and diseases of the care recipient and focusing primarily on neurodegenerative diseases. Focus groups with the carers showed that almost all participants had no previous knowledge of any resource specifically targeting carers, even if interest was expressed towards carer-focused resources. The main barriers for using the resources were low digital skills of the carers and reliability of health-related apps and websites. Results of the focus groups led to a new taxonomy of the resources, comprising 4 categories: carer's wellbeing, managing health and diseases of the care recipient, useful contacts, and technologies for eldercare.

conclusionsThe review process allowed the identification of online resources of good quality. However, these resources are still scarce due to a lack of reliability and usability that prevent users from properly benefiting from most of the resources. The involvement of end users provided added value to the resource classification and highlighted the gap between the potential benefits from using information and communication technologies and the real use of online resources by carers.

Indexed as

CaregiversFrail ElderlyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEuropeGreeceHumansItalyReproducibility of ResultsSwedeninformal carersmobile appsreliabilityusabilitywebsites

Identifiers

PMID32554378
PMCPMC7330736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.