Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32553260›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American College of Cardiology2020

Coronary

Jacek Kwiecinski, Evangelos Tzolos, Philip D Adamson, Sebastien Cadet, Alastair J Moss, Nikhil Joshi, Michelle C Williams, Edwin J R van Beek, Damini Dey, Daniel S Berman and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vascular medicine (London, England) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Head-to-head comparison ofJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2024
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. The effect of Vitamin-KJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Trial
  7. CoronaryCirculation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2020
    Trial
  8. Molecular imaging of atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability: a narrative review.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Reproducibility ofCurrent cardiology reports · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Beyond the Lumen: Molecular Imaging to Unmask Vulnerable Coronary Plaques.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Quantitative aortic Na[European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Commented on by
    2020
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Jacek KwiecinskiDepartment of Imaging (Division of Nuclear Medicine), Medicine, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Department of Interventional Cardiology and Angiology, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Evangelos TzolosDepartment of Imaging (Division of Nuclear Medicine), Medicine, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Philip D AdamsonBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Sebastien CadetDepartment of Imaging (Division of Nuclear Medicine), Medicine, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Alastair J MossBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Nikhil JoshiBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Michelle C WilliamsBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Edwin J R van BeekBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Edinburgh Imaging, Queens Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Damini DeyDepartment of Imaging (Division of Nuclear Medicine), Medicine, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Daniel S BermanDepartment of Imaging (Division of Nuclear Medicine), Medicine, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
David E NewbyBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Piotr J SlomkaDepartment of Imaging (Division of Nuclear Medicine), Medicine, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: piotr.slomka@cshs.org.
Marc R DweckBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
British Heart Foundation · GBCedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

Integrated analysis of coronary anatomy and biology with 18F-fluoride PET and CT angiographyR01HL135557 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI SLOMKA, PIOTR J · 2017 to 2020
$3.0M
British Heart Foundation CH/09/002British Heart Foundation CH/09/002/26360British Heart Foundation FS/11/014British Heart Foundation FS/14/78/31020British Heart Foundation RE/18/5/34216British Heart Foundation RG/16/10/32375Medical Research Council G0701127Medical Research Council MR/T005459/1NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL135557Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT103782AIA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReliable methods for predicting myocardial infarction in patients with established coronary artery disease are lacking. Coronary

objectivesThis study assessed whether

methodsPatients with known coronary artery disease underwent

resultsIn a post hoc analysis of data collected for prospective observational studies, the authors studied 293 study participants (age: 65 ± 9 years; 84% men), of whom 203 (69%) showed increased coronary

conclusionsIn patients with established coronary artery disease,

Indexed as

Fluorine RadioisotopesPositron-Emission TomographyAgedComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPrognosisFluorine-18Fluorine Radioisotopes(18)F-NaF PETcoronary artery diseasecoronary computed tomographycoronary event risk predictionmyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID32553260
PMCPMC7380446
OpenAlexW3034275327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.