Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32552819›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2020

Monitoring the durability of the long-lasting insecticidal nets MAGNet and Royal Sentry in three ecological zones of Mozambique.

Ana Paula Abílio, Emmanuel Obi, Hannah Koenker, Stella Babalola, Abuchahama Saifodine, Rose Zulliger, Isabel Swamidoss, Gabriel Ponce de Leon, Eunice Alfai, Sean Blaufuss and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Durability study of VeeralinParasites & vectors · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Paula AbílioNational Institute of Health, Maputo, Mozambique.
Emmanuel ObiPMI VectorWorks Project, Tropical Health LLP, Abuja, Nigeria.
Hannah KoenkerPMI VectorWorks Project, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA. hannah@trophealth.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8960-4297
Stella BabalolaPMI VectorWorks Project, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abuchahama SaifodineU.S. President's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Agency for International Development, Maputo, Mozambique.
Rose ZulligerU.S. President's Malaria Initiative, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Maputo, Mozambique.
Isabel SwamidossU.S. President's Malaria Initiative, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Gabriel Ponce de LeonU.S. President's Malaria Initiative, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Eunice AlfaiNational Malaria Control Programme, Maputo, Mozambique.
Sean BlaufussPMI VectorWorks Project, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Bolanle OlapejuPMI VectorWorks Project, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Hunter HarigPMI VectorWorks Project, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Albert KilianPMI VectorWorks Project, Tropical Health LLP, Montagut, Spain.
Johns Hopkins University · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Directorate of Geology · MZ

Funding

United States Agency for International Development AID-OAA-A-14-00057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria prevention with long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) has seen a tremendous scale-up in sub-Saharan Africa in the last decade. To sustain this success, it is important to understand how long LLINs remain in the households and continue to protect net users, which is termed durability. This information is needed to decide the appropriate timing of LLIN distribution and also to identify product(s) that may be underperforming relative to expectations. Following guidance from the U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, durability monitoring of polyethylene 150-denier LLIN (Royal Sentry

methodsThis was a prospective cohort study in which representative samples of households from each district were recruited at baseline, 1 to 6 months after the mass campaign. All campaign LLINs in these households were labelled and followed up over a period of 36 months. The primary outcome was the "proportion of LLINs surviving in serviceable condition" based on attrition and integrity measures and the median survival in years. The outcome for insecticidal durability was determined by bio-assay from subsamples of campaign LLINs.

resultsA total of 998 households (98% of target) and 1998 campaign LLIN (85% of target) were included in the study. Definite outcomes could be determined for 80% of the cohort LLIN in Inhambane, 45% in Tete, and 72% in Nampula. The highest all-cause attrition was seen in Nampula with 74% followed by Inhambane at 56% and Tete at 50%. Overall, only 2% of campaign LLINs were used for other purposes. Estimated survival in serviceable condition of campaign LLINs after 36 months was 57% in Inhambane, 43% in Tete, and 33% in Nampula, corresponding to median survival of 3.0, 2.8, and 2.4 years, respectively. Factors that were associated with better survival were exposure to social and behavioural change communication, a positive net care attitude, and folding up the net during the day. Larger household size negatively impacted survival. Insecticidal performance was optimal up to 24 months follow-up, but declined at 36 months when only 3% of samples showed optimal effectiveness in Inhambane, 11% in Tete and 29% in Nampula. However, 96% of LLIN still had minimal effectiveness at 36 months.

conclusionsDifferences in median survival could be attributed at least in part to household environment and net care and repair behaviours. This means that in two of the three sites the assumption of a three-year cycle of campaign distributions holds, while in the Nampula site either continuous distribution channels could be expanded or more intense or targeted social and behaviour change activities to encourage net care and retention could be considered.

Indexed as

EnvironmentHumansInsecticidesInsecticide-Treated BednetsMozambiqueProspective StudiesPyrethrinscypermethrinInsecticidesPyrethrinsLLIN durabilityMonitoringMozambique

Identifiers

PMID32552819
PMCPMC7301518
OpenAlexW3036121644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.