Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32552745›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2020

Women's and girls' experiences of reproductive coercion and opportunities for intervention in family planning clinics in Nairobi, Kenya: a qualitative study.

Sabrina C Boyce, Jasmine Uysal, Stephanie M DeLong, Nicole Carter, Chi-Chi Undie, Wilson Liambila, Seri Wendoh, Jay G Silverman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sabrina C BoyceCenter on Gender Equity and Health, School of Medicine, University of California - San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA. scboyce@health.ucsd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9177-6063
Jasmine UysalCenter on Gender Equity and Health, School of Medicine, University of California - San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Stephanie M DeLongCenter on Gender Equity and Health, School of Medicine, University of California - San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Nicole CarterCenter on Gender Equity and Health, School of Medicine, University of California - San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Chi-Chi UndiePopulation Council, Nairobi, Kenya.
Wilson LiambilaPopulation Council, Nairobi, Kenya.
Seri WendohInternational Planned Parenthood Federation, London, UK.
Jay G SilvermanCenter on Gender Equity and Health, School of Medicine, University of California - San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
University of California San Diego · USBritish Council · KEInternational Planned Parenthood Federation · GB

Funding

Reproductive Coercion and Related Risk FactorsF31HD100019 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BOYCE, SABRINA CHRISTINE · 2019 to 2021
$127k
International Planned Parenthood Federation SIFPO2-SA3-51214010NICHD NIH HHS F31 HD100019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReproductive coercion (RC), which includes contraceptive sabotage and pregnancy coercion, may help explain known associations between intimate partner violence (IPV) and poor reproductive health outcomes, such as unintended pregnancy. In Kenya, where 40% of ever-married women report IPV and 35% of ever-pregnant women report unintended pregnancy, these experiences are pervasive and co-occurring, yet little research exists on RC experiences among women and adolescent girls. This study seeks to qualitatively describe women's and girls' experiences of RC in Nairobi, Kenya and opportunities for clinical intervention.

methodsQualitative data were collected as part of the formative research for the adaptation of an evidence-based intervention to address reproductive coercion and IPV in clinical family planning counselling and provision in Nairobi, Kenya in April 2017. Focus group discussions (n = 4, 30 total participants) and in-depth interviews (n = 10) with family planning clients (ages 15-49) were conducted to identify specific forms of reproductive coercion, other partner-specific barriers to successful contraception use, and perceived opportunities for family planning providers to address RC among women and girls seeking family planning services. Additionally, data were collected via semi-structured interviews with family planning providers (n = 8) and clinic managers (n = 3) from family planning clinics. Data were coded according to structural and emergent themes, summarized, and illustrative quotes were identified to demonstrate sub-themes. Kenyan family planning providers and administrators informed interpretation.

resultsThe results of this study identified specific forms of pregnancy coercion and contraceptive sabotage to be common, and often severe, impeding the use of contraceptives among female family planning clients. This study offers important examples of women's strategies for preventing pregnancy despite experiencing reproductive coercion, as well as opportunities for family planning providers to support clients experiencing reproductive coercion in clinical settings.

conclusionsReproductive coercion is a critical barrier to modern contraceptive use in Kenya. Results from this study highlight opportunities for family planning providers to play a critical role in supporting women and girls in their use of contraception when reproductive coercion is present.

Indexed as

CoercionAdolescentAdultContraceptionFamily Planning ServicesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicIntimate Partner ViolenceKenyaMiddle AgedPregnancyQualitative ResearchYoung AdultFamily planning clinicsIntimate partner violenceReproductive coercionReproductive healthSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID32552745
PMCPMC7298836
OpenAlexW3036143022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.