Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32552722›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Female sex workers perspectives and concerns regarding HIV self-testing: an exploratory study in Tanzania.

Soori Nnko, Daniel Nyato, Evodius Kuringe, Caterina Casalini, Amani Shao, Albert Komba, John Changalucha, Mwita Wambura

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Soori NnkoDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health, National Institute for Medical Research, P.O Box 1462, Mwanza, Tanzania. soori_nnko@yahoo.co.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1835-6032
Daniel NyatoDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health, National Institute for Medical Research, P.O Box 1462, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Evodius KuringeDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health, National Institute for Medical Research, P.O Box 1462, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Caterina CasaliniSauti Program, Jhpiego Tanzania - an affiliate of Johns Hopkins University, P.O Box 9170, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Amani ShaoDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health, National Institute for Medical Research, P.O Box 1462, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Albert KombaSauti Program, Jhpiego Tanzania - an affiliate of Johns Hopkins University, P.O Box 9170, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
John ChangaluchaDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health, National Institute for Medical Research, P.O Box 1462, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Mwita WamburaDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health, National Institute for Medical Research, P.O Box 1462, Mwanza, Tanzania.
National Institute for Medical Research · TZJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (US) AID-621-A-15-00003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV testing is a gateway to HIV care and treatment for people diagnosed with HIV and can link those with negative results to HIV preventive services. Despite the importance of HIV testing services (HTS) in HIV control, uptake of HTS among female sex workers (FSWs) across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) remains sub-optimal. Concerns about stigma associated with sex work and fear of loss of livelihood if HIV status becomes known, are some of the restrictions for FSWs to utilize HTS offered through health care facilities. Introduction of HIV self-testing (HIVST) may mitigate some of the barriers for the uptake of HTS. This study explored the acceptability of FSWs towards the introduction of HIVST in Tanzania.

methodsWe conducted an exploratory study employing in-depth interviews (IDI) and participatory group discussions (PGD) with FSWs in selected regions of Tanzania. Study participants were recruited through snowball sampling. Data were thematically analysed by two analysts using NVivo software. The analysis was informed by the social-ecological model and focused on factors associated with the acceptability of HIVST.

resultsWe conducted 21 PGD sessions involving 227 FSWs. Twenty three IDIs were conducted to complement data collected through PGD. Our study has demonstrated that FSWs are enthusiastic toward HIVST. Convenience (time and cost saved), and belief that HIVST will increase privacy and confidentiality motivated participants' support for the self-testing approach. Participants did express concerns about their ability to interpret and trust the results of the test. Participants also expressed concern that HIVST could cause personal harm, including severe distress and self-harm for individuals with a reactive test. Very likely, concern about adverse effects of HIVST was linked to the study participants' lay perception that HIVST would be provided only through unassisted modality.

conclusionsFSWs demonstrated high enthusiasm to use the HIVST once it becomes available. Expectations for increased confidentiality, autonomy, and reduced opportunity costs were among the leading factors that attracted FSWs to HIVST. The major obstacles to the acceptability of HIVST included fear of HIV reactive test and not trusting self-diagnoses. Our findings underscore the importance of providing adequate access to counselling and referral services in conjunction with HIVST.

Indexed as

Social StigmaAdultCounselingFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMass ScreeningPatient Acceptance of Health CareSelf-ExaminationSerologic TestsSex WorkSex WorkersTanzaniaTrustFemale sex workers, acceptability, exploratory studyHIV self-testingTanzania

Identifiers

PMID32552722
PMCPMC7301461
OpenAlexW3035774135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.