Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32552721›Full record

Observational studyBMC family practice2020

Regional and patient-related factors influencing the willingness to use general practitioners as coordinators of the treatment in northern Germany - results of a cross-sectional observational study.

Heike Hansen, Ingmar Schäfer, Sarah Porzelt, Agata Kazek, Dagmar Lühmann, Martin Scherer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02558322 (Regional Variation of Patient Population and Reasons for Consultation in the Primary Medical Care of Northern Germany), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02558322 completednot on this map

Regional Variation of Patient Population and Reasons for Consultation in the Primary Medical Care of Northern Germany

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfRan2015 to 2017Enrolled1,022ConditionsAny Condition Treated in Primary CareArmsPrimary medical care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heike HansenDepartment of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr, 52 20246, Hamburg, Germany. h.hansen@uke.de.ORCID 0000-0003-4901-3091
Ingmar SchäferDepartment of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr, 52 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Sarah PorzeltDepartment of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr, 52 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Agata KazekDepartment of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr, 52 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Dagmar LühmannDepartment of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr, 52 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Martin SchererDepartment of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr, 52 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn most countries, the general practitioner (GP) is the first point of contact in the healthcare system and coordinator of healthcare. However, in Germany it is possible to consult an outpatient specialist even without referral. Coordination by a GP might thus reduce health expenditures and inequalities in the healthcare system. The study describes the patients' willingness/commitment to use the GP as coordinator of healthcare and identifies regional and patient-related factors associated with the aforementioned commitment to the GP.

methodsCross-sectional observational study using a standardised telephone patient survey in northern Germany. All counties and independent cities within a radius of 120 km around Hamburg were divided into three regional categories (urban areas, environs, rural areas) and stratified proportionally to the population size. Patients who had consulted the GP within the previous three months, and had been patients of the practice for at least three years were randomly selected from medical records of primary care practices in these districts and recruited for the study. Multivariate linear regression models adjusted for random effects at the level of federal states, administrative districts and practices were used as statistical analysis methods.

resultsEight hundred eleven patients (25.1%) from 186 practices and 34 administrative districts were interviewed. The patient commitment to a GP attained an average of 20 out of 24 possible points. Significant differences were found by sex (male vs. female: + 1.14 points, p < 0.001), morbidity (+ 0.10 per disease, p = 0.043), education (high vs. low: - 1.74, p < 0.001), logarithmised household net adjusted disposable income (- 0.93 per step on the logarithmic scale, p = 0.004), regional category (urban areas: - 0.85, p = 0.022; environs: - 0.80, p = 0.045) and healthcare utilisation (each GP contact: + 0.30, p < 0.001; each contact to a medical specialist: - 0.75, p = 0.018). Professional situation and age were not significantly associated with the GP commitment.

conclusionOn average, the patients' commitment to their GP was relatively strong, but there were large differences between patient groups. An increase in the patient commitment to the GP could be achieved through better patient information and targeted interventions, e.g. to women or patients from regions of higher urban density.

trial registrationThe study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02558322).

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareGatekeepingGeneral PracticeAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGeneral PractitionersGermanyHumansMaleMedical OverusePatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient PreferenceReferral and ConsultationRural HealthSocioeconomic FactorsGeneral practiceGeneral practitioner-centred healthcareHealthcare utilisationRegional comparisonUrban-rural differences

Identifiers

PMID32552721
PMCPMC7302141
OpenAlexW3035932141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.