Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32552703›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2020

Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the Fraboni scale of ageism: evidence from medical students sample.

Jun-Yao Fan, Hui-Min Zhao, Yue-Ting Liu, Ling-Lin Kong, Jing Mao, Jie Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jun-Yao FanSchool of Nursing, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 13 Hangkong Rd., Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei Province, China.
Hui-Min ZhaoSchool of Nursing, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 13 Hangkong Rd., Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei Province, China.
Yue-Ting LiuSchool of Nursing, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 13 Hangkong Rd., Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei Province, China.
Ling-Lin KongSchool of Nursing, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 13 Hangkong Rd., Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei Province, China.
Jing MaoSchool of Nursing, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 13 Hangkong Rd., Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei Province, China.
Jie LiSchool of Nursing, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 13 Hangkong Rd., Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei Province, China. lijie@hust.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3272-4850

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 71503088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing of older adults has led to enormous demand for medical care. However, as a group with unique needs and characteristics, older adults are often discriminated against in the medical field. In this paper, we aimed to translate the Fraboni Scale of Ageism (FSA) into Chinese and examine its construct validity, content validity, and reliability in Chinese mainland medical students. In order to evaluate the prevalence of ageism in Chinese medical students and prompt medical college to adopt necessary teaching methods to mitigate ageism in medical students.

methodsBy Brislin's translation guidelines, FSA was translated to Chinese. The convenient sampling method was used to select samples for this survey, including 1,974 students from two medical schools in central and north China. Construct validity was verified by the exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The content validity index (CVI) was used to assess content validity. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to estimate reliability.

resultsThe alpha coefficients for FSA (Chinese version) was 0.81 and ICC was 0.87. The CVI was 0.93. Three factors were identified by exploratory factor analysis explaining 34.84% of the total variance and a three-factor model was confirmed to fit by confirmatory factor analysis.

conclusionsFSA (Chinese version) is a reliable and valid scale for measuring discrimination degree against older adults in Chinese medical students.

Indexed as

AgeismTranslatingAdolescentAdultChinaFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAgeismDiscriminationFraboni scale of ageismMedical studentsReliabilityValidity

Identifiers

PMID32552703
PMCPMC7302149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.