Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32552687›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

A process for developing a sustainable and scalable approach to community engagement: community dialogue approach for addressing the drivers of antibiotic resistance in Bangladesh.

Rebecca King, Joseph Hicks, Christian Rassi, Muhammad Shafique, Deepa Barua, Prashanta Bhowmik, Mahua Das, Helen Elsey, Kate Questa, Fariza Fieroze and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A pill for every ill? Unpacking antibiotic misuse among Bangladeshi university students.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebecca KingNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK. r.king@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3035-9594
Joseph HicksNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
Christian RassiMalaria Consortium, The Green House, 244-254 Cambridge Heath Road, London, E2 9DA, UK.
Muhammad ShafiqueMalaria Consortium, The Green House, 244-254 Cambridge Heath Road, London, E2 9DA, UK.
Deepa BaruaARK Foundation, Suite C-3 &C-4, House 06, Road 109, Gulshan2, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Prashanta BhowmikARK Foundation, Suite C-3 &C-4, House 06, Road 109, Gulshan2, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Mahua DasNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
Helen ElseyCentre for Health and Population Sciences, Hull York Medical School, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Kate QuestaNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
Fariza FierozeARK Foundation, Suite C-3 &C-4, House 06, Road 109, Gulshan2, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Prudence HamadeMalaria Consortium, The Green House, 244-254 Cambridge Heath Road, London, E2 9DA, UK.
Sameena HuqueARK Foundation, Suite C-3 &C-4, House 06, Road 109, Gulshan2, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
James NewellNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
Rumana HuqueARK Foundation, Suite C-3 &C-4, House 06, Road 109, Gulshan2, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
ARK Foundation · BDUniversity of Leeds · GBMalaria Consortium · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/P004075/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity engagement approaches that have impacted on health outcomes are often time intensive, small-scale and require high levels of financial and human resources. They can be difficult to sustain and scale-up in low resource settings. Given the reach of health services into communities in low income countries, the health system provides a valuable and potentially sustainable entry point that would allow for scale-up of community engagement interventions. This study explores the process of developing an embedded approach to community engagement taking the global challenge of antibiotic resistance as an example.

methodsThe intervention was developed using a sequential mixed methods study design. This consisted of: exploring the evidence base through an umbrella review, and identifying key international standards on the appropriate use of antibiotics; undertaking detailed formative research through a) a qualitative study to explore the most appropriate mechanisms through which to embed the intervention within the existing health system and community infrastructure, and to understand patterns of knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding antibiotics and antibiotic resistance; and b) a household survey - which drew on the qualitative findings - to quantify knowledge, and reported attitudes and practice regarding antibiotics and antibiotic resistance within the target population; and c) drawing on appropriate theories regarding change mechanisms and experience of implementing community engagement interventions to co-produce the intervention processes and materials with key stakeholders at policy, health system and community level.

resultsA community engagement intervention was co-produced and was explicitly designed to link into existing health system and community structures and be appropriate for the cultural context, and therefore have the potential to be implemented at scale. We anticipate that taking this approach increases local ownership, as well as the likelihood that the intervention will be sustainable and scalable.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the value of ensuring that a range of stakeholders co-produce the intervention, and ensuring that the intervention is designed to be appropriate for the health system, community and cultural context.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, MicrobialAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsBangladeshCommunity Health ServicesFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic resistanceAntimicrobial resistanceBangladeshCommunity engagementIntervention development

Identifiers

PMID32552687
PMCPMC7302129
OpenAlexW3036502914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.