Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32552571›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of vision science2020

Role of Feedback Connections in Central Visual Processing.

Farran Briggs

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of vision science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Projection-specific Routing of Odor Information in the Olfactory Cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Reciprocal interaction between cortical SST and PV interneurons in top-down regulation of retinothalamic refinement.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Motor Control of Distinct Layer 6 Corticothalamic Feedback Circuits.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  17. A Unifying Model for Discordant and Concordant Results in Human Neuroimaging Studies of Facial Viewpoint Selectivity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Farran BriggsDepartments of Neuroscience and Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, and Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14642, USA; email: Farran_briggs@urmc.rochester.edu.

Funding

The functional role of corticogeniculate feedback in visionR01EY025219 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Adam Christopher Snyder · 2016 to 2026
$4.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The physiological response properties of neurons in the visual system are inherited mainly from feedforward inputs. Interestingly, feedback inputs often outnumber feedforward inputs. Although they are numerous, feedback connections are weaker, slower, and considered to be modulatory, in contrast to fast, high-efficacy feedforward connections. Accordingly, the functional role of feedback in visual processing has remained a fundamental mystery in vision science. At the core of this mystery are questions about whether feedback circuits regulate spatial receptive field properties versus temporal responses among target neurons, or whether feedback serves a more global role in arousal or attention. These proposed functions are not mutually exclusive, and there is compelling evidence to support multiple functional roles for feedback. In this review, the role of feedback in vision will be explored mainly from the perspective of corticothalamic feedback. Further generalized principles of feedback applicable to corticocortical connections will also be considered.

Indexed as

FeedbackHumansNeuronsPhotic StimulationVisual CortexVisual PathwaysVisual Perceptioncorticocorticalcorticogeniculatecorticothalamicfeedbackspatial receptive field propertiestemporal receptive field properties

Identifiers

PMID32552571
PMCPMC9990137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.