Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32552409›Full record

SynthesisPalliative medicine2020

The palliative care needs of adults with intellectual disabilities and their access to palliative care services: A systematic review.

Emily Adam, Katherine E Sleeman, Sarah Brearley, Katherine Hunt, Irene Tuffrey-Wijne

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Palliative medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Challenges to timely access to out-of-hours end-of-life medications: a qualitative study in UK primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Reflections on an Evidence Review Process to Inform the Co-Design of a Toolkit for Supporting End-of-Life Care Planning With People With Intellectual Disabilities.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Emily AdamCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3283-0669
Katherine E SleemanCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9777-4373
Sarah BrearleyFaculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Katherine HuntFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6173-7319
Irene Tuffrey-WijneFaculty of Health, Social Care & Education, Kingston University and St George's, University of London, London, UK.
King's College London · GBLancaster University · GBSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Department of Health CS-2015-15-005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is evidence that people with intellectual disabilities experience healthcare inequalities, including access to specialist palliative care, but to date, there has not been a systematic review of empirical evidence.

aimTo identify the palliative care needs of adults with intellectual disabilities and the barriers and facilitators they face in accessing palliative care.

designSystematic review using a narrative synthesis approach (International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) registration number: CRD42019138974). DATA SOURCES: Five databases were searched in June 2019 (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, the Cochrane library and CINAHL) along with hand searches and a search of the grey literature. All study designs were included.

resultsA total of 52 studies were identified, all of which were conducted in high-income countries, the majority in the United Kingdom (

conclusionThis review highlights the specific problems in providing equitable palliative care for adults with intellectual disabilities, but there is a lack of research into strategies to improve practice. This should be prioritised using methods that include people with intellectual disabilities and families.

Indexed as

Hospice and Palliative Care NursingIntellectual DisabilityAdultHumansPalliative CareUnited Kingdomhealth services accessibilityhealth services needs and demandintellectual disabilityPalliative care

Identifiers

PMID32552409
PMCPMC7596767
OpenAlexW3035889400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.