Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32552345›Full record

ArticleSoft robotics2021

Characteristic Analysis and Design Optimization of Bubble Artificial Muscles.

Richard Suphapol Diteesawat, Tim Helps, Majid Taghavi, Jonathan Rossiter

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Soft robotics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Resistive Soft Robotic Exosuit for Dynamic Body Loading in Hypogravity.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Direct-Ink-Writing 3D-Printed Bioelectronics.Materials today (Kidlington, England) · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A Collapsible Soft Actuator Facilitates Performance in Constrained Environments.Advanced intelligent systems (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richard Suphapol DiteesawatDepartment of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Tim HelpsDepartment of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Majid TaghaviDepartment of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Jonathan RossiterDepartment of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soft robotics requires new actuators and artificial muscles that are lighter, less expensive, and more effective than current technologies. Recently developed bubble artificial muscles (BAMs) are lightweight, flexible, inexpensive, pneumatic actuators with the capability of being scalable, contracting at a low pressure, and generating sufficient tension and contraction for assisting human mobility. The BAMs are simply fabricated by using a commercial plastic tubing with retaining rings, forming a "bubble" shape and creating a series of contractile units to attain a desired stroke. They can deliver high contraction through optimization of actuator length and radius, or high tension by strengthening their materials to operate at high pressure. Here, we present a detailed analysis of BAMs, define a model for their actuation, and verify the model through a series of experiments with fabricated BAM actuators. In tests, a maximum contraction of 43.1% and a maximum stress of 0.894 MPa were achieved, corresponding to the BAM lifting a load 1000 times its own weight (5.39 g). The BAM model was built to predict experimental performance, for example, the relationship between tension and contraction at various applied pressures, and between contraction and pressure. Characteristic analysis and design optimization of the BAM are presented as an approach to design and manufacture the ideal "bubble" actuator at any required dimensions. A BAM orthosis is demonstrated as assisting a sit-to-stand transition on a leg mechanism, constructed to match the scale of a human's lower limb. Guidelines for further improvement of the BAM are also included.

Indexed as

Muscle ContractionRoboticsEquipment DesignHumansMusclesactuatorartificial musclefluidicpneumaticwearable

Identifiers

PMID32552345
PMCPMC8082735
OpenAlexW3036916881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.