Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32552021›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2020

From "Infodemics" to Health Promotion: A Novel Framework for the Role of Social Media in Public Health.

Dean Schillinger, Deepti Chittamuru, A Susana Ramírez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Barriers to Public Health Trust-Building Using Social Media: A Qualitative Analysis.Disaster medicine and public health preparedness · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dean SchillingerDean Schillinger is with the Health Communications Research Program, Center for Vulnerable Populations, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco. Deepti Chittamuru and A. Susana Ramírez are with the Department of Public Health, School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts, University of California, Merced.
Deepti ChittamuruDean Schillinger is with the Health Communications Research Program, Center for Vulnerable Populations, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco. Deepti Chittamuru and A. Susana Ramírez are with the Department of Public Health, School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts, University of California, Merced.
A Susana RamírezDean Schillinger is with the Health Communications Research Program, Center for Vulnerable Populations, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco. Deepti Chittamuru and A. Susana Ramírez are with the Department of Public Health, School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts, University of California, Merced.

Funding

Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
The Next Frontier in Diabetes Communication: Promoting Health Literacy in the Era of Secure MessagingR01LM012355 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KARTER, ANDREW JOHN, SCHILLINGER, DEAN · 2015 to 2018
$2.8M
Breast Cancer Prevention mHealth Intervention for Rural LatinasK01CA190659 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MERCED · PI RAMIREZ, A SUSANA · 2015 to 2020
$641k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA190659NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the ubiquity of health-related communications via social media, no consensus has emerged on whether this medium, on balance, jeopardizes or promotes public health. During the COVID-19 pandemic, social media has been described as the source of a toxic "infodemic" or a valuable tool for public health. No conceptual model exists for examining the roles that social media can play with respect to population health.We present a novel framework to guide the investigation and assessment of the effects of social media on public health: the SPHERE (Social media and Public Health Epidemic and REsponse) continuum. This model illustrates the functions of social media across the epidemic-response continuum, ranging across contagion, vector, surveillance, inoculant, disease control, and treatment.We also describe attributes of the communications, diseases and pathogens, and hosts that influence whether certain functions dominate over others. Finally, we describe a comprehensive set of outcomes relevant to the evaluation of the effects of social media on the public's health.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralPublic HealthSocial MediaCommunicationCOVID-19Health PromotionHumansSARS-CoV-2United States

Identifiers

PMID32552021
PMCPMC7427212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.