Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32551853›Full record

Trial reportCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

S-1 Maintenance Therapy in Extensive Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer-A Randomized Clinical Study.

Keke Nie, Xiuhui Guo, Yunhong You, Xingjun Zhuang, Chunling Zhang, Youxin Ji

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Immunotherapy era in the treatment of small cell lung cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Keke NieDepartment of Oncology, Qingdao Central Hospital, Qingdao University, China.
Xiuhui GuoPingdu People's Hospital, Qingdao, China.
Yunhong YouDepartment of Oncology, Qingdao Central Hospital, Qingdao University, China.
Xingjun ZhuangDepartment of Oncology, PLA 971 Hospital, Qingdao City, China.
Chunling ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Qingdao Central Hospital, Qingdao University, China.
Youxin JiDepartment of Oncology, Qingdao Central Hospital, Qingdao University, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2303-8784
Qingdao University · CNPeople's Liberation Army 401 Hospital · CNQingdao Eighth People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a recalcitrant cancer for its dismal prognosis although extensive research had been done. Four to 6 cycles platinum-based chemotherapy is the mainstay treatment for the extensive-stage disease; but the role of maintenance treatment is not fully understood. This is a phase 2, open-label study. Patients with extensive-stage SCLC reaching an objective response or stable disease (SD) after induction chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) with a minimization procedure. One group received oral S-1 and the other group received placebo as maintenance treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. The primary end point of this study was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary end points were overall survival (OS), response rates, and toxicities. This study was based on earlier work, the preliminary results was reported on 2019 ASCO annual meeting. A total of 89 patients were enrolled, of whom 45 received S-1 maintenance therapy and 44 received placebo. The median PFS and OS were 6.35 months and 10.82 months in the S-1 group, as compared to 5.98 months and 10.09 months in the placebo group. The PFS was 7.2 months and 5.3 months, and OS was 12.9 months and 10.9 months in patients with an objective response compared to in patients with SD after induction chemotherapy, respectively. S-1 maintenance therapy did not prolong PFS or OS in patients with extensive-stage SCLC; tumor regression rate was the prognostic factor of PFS or OS. Further research with novel agents in the maintenance setting is warranted.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCisplatinDrug CombinationsEtoposideFemaleHumansIrinotecanLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedOxonic AcidPatient SafetySmall Cell Lung CarcinomaSurvival RateCisplatinDrug CombinationsEtoposideIrinotecanOxonic AcidS 1 (combination)Tegafurextensive-stage small-cell lung carcinomamaintenance therapyS-1tumor regression rate

Identifiers

PMID32551853
PMCPMC7307401
OpenAlexW3036932993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.