ArticleBiopreservation and biobanking2020
The Barriers and Motivators to Using Human Tissues for Research: The Views of UK-Based Biomedical Researchers.
Article in Biopreservation and biobanking, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Multi-Institution Biobanking Pipeline for Primary Human Satellite Cells and Fibro-Adipogenic Progenitors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Willingness to accept paediatric blood sample collection for clinical research purposes in Nepal: a qualitative study.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Degree Background and NIH K-to-R01 Transition Among Investigators Using Experimental Neuroscience to Advance Psychiatry.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026Article
- Quantifying the impact of biobanks and cohort studies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Pass the tissue: restoring researcher access to legal human donations.Journal of medical ethics · 2025Article
- The chemokines CCL22 and CCL17 are a defining feature of type 2 stimulated human lung macrophages and exhibit different metabolic dependencies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Applying Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable Principles to Biospecimens and Biobanks.Biopreservation and biobanking · 2024Article
- Review
- Review
- Drivers and constraints to environmental sustainability in UK-based biobanking: balancing resource efficiency and future value.BMC medical ethics · 2023Article
- Stakeholder engagement to ensure the sustainability of biobanks: a survey of potential users of biobank services.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2022Article
- Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic about sample access for research in the UK.BMJ open · 2022Review
- Cell models for Down syndrome-Alzheimer's disease research.Neuronal signaling · 2022Review
- The Availability of Human Biospecimens to Support Biomarker Research.Biomarker insights · 2022Review
- Recommendations for a Dutch Sustainable Biobanking Environment.Biopreservation and biobanking · 2021Article
- Building Research Support Capacity across Human Health Biobanks during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Biomarker insights · 2021Article
- Moving with the Times: The Health Science Alliance (HSA) Biobank, Pathway to Sustainability.Biomarker insights · 2021Article
- Biobanking for Cancer Biomarker Research: Issues and Solutions.Biomarker insights · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.