Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32551449›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2020

Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Versus Intranasal Ketamine as Premedication for Level of Sedation in Children Undergoing Radiation Therapy: A Prospective, Randomised, Double-Blind Study.

Praneeth Suvvari, Seema Mishra, Sushma Bhatnagar, Rakesh Garg, Sachidanand Jee Bharati, Nishkarsh Gupta, Vinod Kumar, M A Khan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Praneeth SuvvariDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia & Palliative Medicine, Dr BRA-Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1428-680X
Seema MishraDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia & Palliative Medicine, Dr BRA-Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9233-809X
Sushma BhatnagarDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia & Palliative Medicine, Dr BRA-Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2097-7180
Rakesh GargDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia & Palliative Medicine, Dr BRA-Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5842-8024
Sachidanand Jee BharatiDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia & Palliative Medicine, Dr BRA-Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3398-1293
Nishkarsh GuptaDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia & Palliative Medicine, Dr BRA-Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8444-2564
Vinod KumarDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia & Palliative Medicine, Dr BRA-Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9248-4641
M A KhanDepartment of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9449-6518
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRadiation therapy is indicated in many solid tumours in children. Absolute immobility is required to precisely position children for optimal delivery of radiation energy to the target tissues, improve success rate and reduce the damage to nearby normal tissues. Intranasal (IN) administration of drugs is well tolerated, effective and fast acting. The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of IN ketamine and dexmedetomidine for providing sedation in children before shifting to the radiotherapy suite. The secondary objective was to assess the requirement of propofol dosage in these patients.

methodsA total of 243 children aged between 1 and 5 years scheduled to undergo external beam radiotherapy were randomised to receive 5 mg kg

resultsA significantly higher proportion of children in group D (84.7%) achieved an MRS score ≥3 as compared to group K (36.2%) and group S (3.84%). The total propofol dose (mg kg

conclusionThe present study demonstrated that IN dexmedetomidine is superior to IN ketamine to provide procedural sedation for radiotherapy in children.

Indexed as

Dexmedetomidineintranasalketaminepropofolradiotherapysedation

Identifiers

PMID32551449
PMCPMC7279870
OpenAlexW2979680642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.