Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32551357›Full record

ArticleSSM - population health2020

The French pill scare and the reshaping of social inequalities in access to medical contraceptives.

Mireille Le Guen, Mylène Rouzaud-Cornabas, Henri Panjo, Laurent Rigal, Virginie Ringa, Caroline Moreau, Health Barometer group 2016

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - population health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mireille Le GuenCentre for Demographic Research, Université catholique de Louvain, Place Montesquieu 1, L2.08.03, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Mylène Rouzaud-CornabasSoins primaires et prévention, CESP Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, U1018, Inserm, F-94807 Villejuif, France.
Henri PanjoSoins primaires et prévention, CESP Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, U1018, Inserm, F-94807 Villejuif, France.
Laurent RigalSoins primaires et prévention, CESP Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, U1018, Inserm, F-94807 Villejuif, France.
Virginie RingaSoins primaires et prévention, CESP Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, U1018, Inserm, F-94807 Villejuif, France.
Caroline MoreauSoins primaires et prévention, CESP Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, U1018, Inserm, F-94807 Villejuif, France.
Health Barometer group 2016
Institut national d'études démographiques · FRInserm · FRJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the consequences of various "pill scares" have been relatively well-documented in the public health literature revealing a drop in pill use and a rise in unplanned pregnancies and abortion rates, researchers rarely considered that these controversies would affect women contraceptive practices differently according to their social background. Indeed, social differentiations in reaction to "pill scares" could contribute to reinforce the social gradient in the use of contraceptive methods and choice of visiting the health professionals who prescribe them. These could contribute to an increase in health inequalities on access to contraceptive methods. Using data from three state nationally representative cross-sectional surveys conducted in France in 2010, 2013 and 2016, we studied the changes in women's contraceptive uses around the French "pill scare" that occurred in 2012-2013. We focused on the changes in the use of all contraceptives available under medical prescription (called medical contraceptives) on one hand, and on each specific method (pill, IUD, implant, patch or vaginal ring, and female sterilization) on the other hand according to the women's social background. We saw a social gradient in contraceptives changes. The decline in the use of contraceptive methods available under medical prescription was particularly marked for women from lower and higher classes in which we observe a decrease in pill use between 2010 and 2013, whereas it was observed only between 2013 and 2016 among middle class women. Moreover, while some women from upper class shifted from pill to IUD between 2010 and 2013, this was not the case for their less privileged counterparts. As a consequence, it seems that the French "pill scare" led to the reshaping of social inequalities in access to medical contraceptives.

Indexed as

Contraceptive useFemale sterilizationIUDPillPill scareSocial inequalities

Identifiers

PMID32551357
PMCPMC7292912
OpenAlexW3029447562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.