ArticlePeerJ2020
SMRT sequencing of the full-length transcriptome of the white-backed planthopper
Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiomics analysis reveals candidate genes and pathway involved in isoquinoline alkaloids in Zanthoxylum armatum DC. fruit.Plant molecular biology · 2025Article
- Characterization of full-length long noncoding RNAs and identification of virus-responsive lncRNAs inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Diverse Regulatory Manners and Potential Roles of lncRNAs in the Developmental Process of Asian Honey Bee (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- SMRT Sequencing Technology Was Used to Construct theInsects · 2023Article
- Article
- The transcriptomic response ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
- Article
- A full-length transcriptome and gene expression analysis of three detoxification gene families in a predatory stink bug,Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- SMRT Sequencing of the Full-Length Transcriptome of theFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The white-backed planthopper
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.