Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32551138›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience of consciousness2020

A systematic investigation of the association between network dynamics in the human brain and the state of consciousness.

Julia S Crone, Evan S Lutkenhoff, Paul M Vespa, Martin M Monti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience of consciousness, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prognosis of consciousness disorders in the intensive care unit.Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983) · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Consciousness is supported by near-critical slow cortical electrodynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julia S CroneDepartment of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0787-7003
Evan S LutkenhoffDepartment of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Paul M VespaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Martin M MontiDepartment of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

Funding

CELL-SPECIFIC MECHANISM AND FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY IN TBI USING OPTOGENETIC fMRIK99NS104243 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CRONE, JULIA S · 2018 to 2019
$186k
NINDS NIH HHS K99 NS104243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing amount of studies suggest that brain dynamics measured with resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) are related to the state of consciousness. However, the challenge of investigating neuronal correlates of consciousness is the confounding interference between (recovery of) consciousness and behavioral responsiveness. To address this issue, and validate the interpretation of prior work linking brain dynamics and consciousness, we performed a longitudinal fMRI study in patients recovering from coma. Patients were assessed twice, 6 months apart, and assigned to one of two groups. One group included patients who were unconscious at the first assessment but regained consciousness and improved behavioral responsiveness by the second assessment. The other group included patients who were already conscious and improved only behavioral responsiveness. While the two groups were matched in terms of the average increase in behavioral responsiveness, only one group experienced a categorical change in their state of consciousness allowing us to partially dissociate consciousness and behavioral responsiveness. We find the variance in network metrics to be systematically different across states of consciousness, both within and across groups. Specifically, at the first assessment, conscious patients exhibited significantly greater variance in network metrics than unconscious patients, a difference that disappeared once all patients had recovered consciousness. Furthermore, we find a significant increase in dynamics for patients who regained consciousness over time, but not for patients who only improved responsiveness. These findings suggest that changes in brain dynamics are indeed linked to the state of consciousness and not just to a general level of behavioral responsiveness.

Indexed as

brain dynamicsdisorders of consciousnessfMRIstates of consciousnesstime-varying network interaction

Identifiers

PMID32551138
PMCPMC7293819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.