ReviewEcology and evolution2020
Evolution of ungulate mating systems: Integrating social and environmental factors.
Review in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inbreeding in a Fission-Fusion Equid Decreases Following an Increase in the Number and Redistribution of Water Sources.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Resource management as a conservation tool to impact genetic diversity through mating patterns in wild populations.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026Article
- Adult Sex Ratio as a Demographic Feedback Linking Mating Systems, Parental Care, and Evolution.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Tradeoffs Among Predator Control, Moose Harvests, and Trophy Antlers: Principles Pertinent to Managing Alaska's Wildlife.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Article
- Ecological correlates of chital (Axis axis) reproductive seasonality in Kanha Tiger Reserve.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cropland restricts occurrence and alters spatial ecology near the mule deer geographical range limit.Movement ecology · 2025Article
- Interactions between host sex and seasonal changes shape the gut microbial communities of wild blue sheep (Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Away from the herd: loneliness as a dysfunction of social alignment.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2024Article
- Harem size should be measured by more than the sum of its parts: Phenology-based measurements reveal joint effects of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on a polygamous herbivore under non-stationary climatic conditions.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Reproductive biology ofCurrent zoology · 2023Article
- Grouping behaviour and activity patterns of impala (Heliyon · 2022Article
- Reformulation of Trivers-Willard hypothesis for parental investment.Communications biology · 2022Article
- "Move or Not to Move"-Red Deer Stags Movement Activity during the Rut.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Contrasting selection pressure on body and weapon size in a polygynous megaherbivore.Biology letters · 2021Article
- Linking alternative reproductive tactics and habitat selection in Northern chamois.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Successful breeding predicts divorce in plovers.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Evolution of ungulate mating systems: Integrating social and environmental factors.Ecology and evolution · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ungulates exhibit diverse mating systems that range from monogamous pair territories to highly polygynous leks. We review mating systems and behaviors across ungulates and offer a new approach synthesizing how interacting factors may shape those mating systems. Variability exists in mating systems among and within species of ungulates and likely is affected by predation risk, availability of resources (food and mates), habitat structure, and sociality. Ungulate mating systems may be labile as a consequence of the varying strength of those interacting factors. In addition, degree of polygyny and sexual dimorphism in size are associated with the evolution of mating systems. Neither male-male combat nor paternal care, however, can completely explain differences in sexual size dimorphism for ungulates, a necessary component in understanding the development of some mating systems. Whatever the evolutionary pathway, sexual segregation limits paternal care allowing more intense male-male competition. Selection of habitat structure, because it modifies risk of predation, is a major determinant of sociality for ungulates. Likewise, ruggedness and steepness of terrain limit the types of mating systems that can occur because of limitations in group size and cohesiveness, as well as the ability of males to herd even small groups of females effectively. The quality and defensibility of resources affect mating systems, as does the defensibility of females. Population density of females also may be a critical determinant of the types of mating systems that develop. Size of groups likewise constrains the types of mating tactics that males can employ. Our aim was to use those relationships to create a broad conceptual model that predicts how various environmental and social factors interact to structure mating systems in ungulates. This model provides a useful framework for future tests of the roles of both ecological and social conditions in influencing the social systems of ungulates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.