Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32551090›Full record

ReviewEcology and evolution2020

Evolution of ungulate mating systems: Integrating social and environmental factors.

R Terry Bowyer, Dale R McCullough, Janet L Rachlow, Simone Ciuti, Jericho C Whiting

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Resource management as a conservation tool to impact genetic diversity through mating patterns in wild populations.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Away from the herd: loneliness as a dysfunction of social alignment.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Reproductive biology ofCurrent zoology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. "Move or Not to Move"-Red Deer Stags Movement Activity during the Rut.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

R Terry BowyerInstitute of Arctic Biology University of Alaska Fairbanks Fairbanks AK USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1398-4104
Dale R McCulloughDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy and Management University of California Berkeley CA USA.
Janet L RachlowDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Sciences University of Idaho Moscow ID USA.
Simone CiutiLaboratory of Wildlife Ecology and Behaviour School of Biology and Environmental Science University College Dublin Dublin Ireland.
Jericho C WhitingDepartment of Biology Brigham Young University-Idaho Rexburg ID USA.
Brigham Young University - Idaho · USUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Alaska Fairbanks · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Idaho · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ungulates exhibit diverse mating systems that range from monogamous pair territories to highly polygynous leks. We review mating systems and behaviors across ungulates and offer a new approach synthesizing how interacting factors may shape those mating systems. Variability exists in mating systems among and within species of ungulates and likely is affected by predation risk, availability of resources (food and mates), habitat structure, and sociality. Ungulate mating systems may be labile as a consequence of the varying strength of those interacting factors. In addition, degree of polygyny and sexual dimorphism in size are associated with the evolution of mating systems. Neither male-male combat nor paternal care, however, can completely explain differences in sexual size dimorphism for ungulates, a necessary component in understanding the development of some mating systems. Whatever the evolutionary pathway, sexual segregation limits paternal care allowing more intense male-male competition. Selection of habitat structure, because it modifies risk of predation, is a major determinant of sociality for ungulates. Likewise, ruggedness and steepness of terrain limit the types of mating systems that can occur because of limitations in group size and cohesiveness, as well as the ability of males to herd even small groups of females effectively. The quality and defensibility of resources affect mating systems, as does the defensibility of females. Population density of females also may be a critical determinant of the types of mating systems that develop. Size of groups likewise constrains the types of mating tactics that males can employ. Our aim was to use those relationships to create a broad conceptual model that predicts how various environmental and social factors interact to structure mating systems in ungulates. This model provides a useful framework for future tests of the roles of both ecological and social conditions in influencing the social systems of ungulates.

Indexed as

matingmonogamypolygynysocial systemterrainterritoriality

Identifiers

PMID32551090
PMCPMC7297761
OpenAlexW3016297730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.