Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32551064›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Shifts in potential geographical distribution of

Keliang Zhang, Huina Liu, Haolei Pan, Wenhao Shi, Yi Zhao, Silei Li, Junchi Liu, Jun Tao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Future of Three Endemic Woody Species ofEcology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Assessing the impact of climate change on the distribution of Osmanthus fragrans using Maxent.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Keliang ZhangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology College of Horticulture and Plant Protection Yangzhou University Yangzhou China.
Huina LiuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology College of Horticulture and Plant Protection Yangzhou University Yangzhou China.
Haolei PanJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology College of Horticulture and Plant Protection Yangzhou University Yangzhou China.
Wenhao ShiJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology College of Horticulture and Plant Protection Yangzhou University Yangzhou China.
Yi ZhaoJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology College of Horticulture and Plant Protection Yangzhou University Yangzhou China.
Silei LiJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology College of Horticulture and Plant Protection Yangzhou University Yangzhou China.
Junchi LiuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology College of Horticulture and Plant Protection Yangzhou University Yangzhou China.
Jun TaoJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology College of Horticulture and Plant Protection Yangzhou University Yangzhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3657-1505

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change poses a serious threat to biodiversity. Predicting the effects of climate change on the distribution of a species' habitat can help humans address the potential threats which may change the scope and distribution of species.

Indexed as

climate changeecologic niche modelingGARPMaxentpotential suitable habitatPterocarya stenoptera

Identifiers

PMID32551064
PMCPMC7297781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.