Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32551052›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Effects of captivity, diet, and relocation on the gut bacterial communities of white-footed mice.

Pauline van Leeuwen, Nadia Mykytczuk, Gabriela F Mastromonaco, Albrecht I Schulte-Hostedde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparative assessment of Texas horned lizard (Frontiers in microbiomes · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Assessment of Adaptation Status of ReintroducedAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pauline van LeeuwenDepartment of Biology Laurentian University Sudbury ON Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9558-1359
Nadia MykytczukVale Living with Lakes Centre Laurentian University Sudbury ON Canada.
Gabriela F MastromonacoReproductive Physiology Toronto Zoo Scarborough ON Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6229-0355
Albrecht I Schulte-HosteddeDepartment of Biology Laurentian University Sudbury ON Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7263-4764

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbes can have important impacts on their host's survival. Captive breeding programs for endangered species include periods of captivity that can ultimately have an impact on reintroduction success. No study to date has investigated the impacts of captive diet on the gut microbiota during the relocation process of generalist species. This study simulated a captive breeding program with white-footed mice (

Indexed as

16S rRNA genecaptivityconservation biologydietgut microbiotareintroductionwild mice

Identifiers

PMID32551052
PMCPMC7297780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.