Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32551045›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Are shed hair genomes the most effective noninvasive resource for estimating relationships in the wild?

Anubhab Khan, Kaushalkumar Patel, Subhadeep Bhattacharjee, Sudarshan Sharma, Anup N Chugani, Karthikeyan Sivaraman, Vinayak Hosawad, Yogesh Kumar Sahu, Goddilla V Reddy, Uma Ramakrishnan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rewilded horses in European nature conservation - a genetics, ethics, and welfare perspective.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The year of the tiger and the year of tiger genomes!Molecular ecology resources · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genomic evidence for inbreeding depression and purging of deleterious genetic variation in Indian tigers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. High frequency of an otherwise rare phenotype in a small and isolated tiger population.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anubhab KhanNational Centre for Biological Sciences TIFR Bangalore India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6342-6522
Kaushalkumar PatelNational Centre for Biological Sciences TIFR Bangalore India.
Subhadeep BhattacharjeeRajasthan Forest Department Jaipur India.
Sudarshan SharmaRajasthan Forest Department Jaipur India.
Anup N ChuganiMedgenome Labs Pvt. Ltd Bangalore India.
Karthikeyan SivaramanMedgenome Labs Pvt. Ltd Bangalore India.
Vinayak HosawadMedgenome Labs Pvt. Ltd Bangalore India.
Yogesh Kumar SahuRajasthan Forest Department Jaipur India.
Goddilla V ReddyRajasthan Forest Department Jaipur India.
Uma RamakrishnanNational Centre for Biological Sciences TIFR Bangalore India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5370-5966

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/S/16/2/502714Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of relationships in wild populations is critical for better understanding mating systems and inbreeding scenarios to inform conservation strategies for endangered species. To delineate pedigrees in wild populations, study genetic connectivity, study genotype-phenotype associations, trace individuals, or track wildlife trade, many identified individuals need to be genotyped at thousands of loci, mostly from noninvasive samples. This requires us to (a) identify the most common noninvasive sample available from identified individuals, (b) assess the ability to acquire genome-wide data from such samples, and (c) evaluate the quality of such genome-wide data, and its ability to reconstruct relationships between animals within a population.We followed identified individuals from a wild endangered tiger population and found that shed hair samples were the most common compared to scat samples, opportunistically found carcasses, and opportunistic invasive samples. We extracted DNA from these samples, prepared whole genome sequencing libraries, and sequenced genomes from these.Whole genome sequencing methods resulted in between 25%-98% of the genome sequenced for five such samples. Exploratory population genetic analyses revealed that these data were free of holistic biases and could recover expected population structure and relatedness. Mitochondrial genomes recovered matrilineages in accordance with long-term monitoring data. Even with just five samples, we were able to uncover the matrilineage for three individuals with unknown ancestry.In summary, we demonstrated that noninvasive shed hair samples yield adequate quality and quantity of DNA in conjunction with sensitive library preparation methods, and provide reliable data from hundreds of thousands of SNPs across the genome. This makes shed hair an ideal noninvasive resource for studying individual-based genetics of elusive endangered species in the wild.

Indexed as

genomenoninvasive samplepedigreeRanthambore Tiger Reserverelatednessrelationshipsshed hair

Identifiers

PMID32551045
PMCPMC7297754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.