Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32551033›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in chronic disease2020

Effectiveness and safety of leflunomide compared with cyclophosphamide as induction therapy in Takayasu's arteritis: an observational study.

Xiaomin Dai, Xiaomeng Cui, Ying Sun, Lili Ma, Lindi Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in chronic disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Management of Takayasu Arteritis - A 2026 Update.Current rheumatology reports · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaomin DaiDepartment of Rheumatology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaomeng CuiDepartment of Rheumatology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ying SunDepartment of Rheumatology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lili MaDepartment of Rheumatology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lindi JiangDepartment of Rheumatology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180, Road Fenglin, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, P. R. China Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4326-6517
Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe objective of this study was to investigate the outcomes of leflunomide (LEF) compared with those of cyclophosphamide (CYC) as induction against active Takayasu's arteritis (TA) in Chinese patients.

methodsThis was an observational study based on a prospective cohort that included TA patients diagnosed in large third-level first-class general hospitals in East China from January 2009 to September 2018. LEF- or CYC-induced active patients were enrolled for comparative effectiveness analysis. One-to-more paired cohorts of LEF

resultsA total of 131 enrolled patients with at least 3-months treatment included 53 receiving a regimen of glucocorticoid (GC) and LEF and 78 receiving GC and CYC. Compared with the CYC group, the LEF group showed higher CR rate {LEF

conclusionLEF could be an alternative induction therapy against TA, showing good effectiveness and tolerance compared with CYC.

Indexed as

cyclophosphamideleflunomideTakayasu’s arteritistreatment

Identifiers

PMID32551033
PMCPMC7278326
OpenAlexW3033286234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.