Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32551026›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2020

Introduction of new techniques and technologies in surgery: Where is transanal total mesorectal excision today?

Antonio Caycedo-Marulanda, Sunil Patel, Shaila Merchant, Carl Brown

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Robotic transanal total mesorectal excision: Is the future now?World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio Caycedo-MarulandaDepartment of surgery, Queen's University and Kingston General Hospital, Kingston K7L 2V7, Ontario, Canada. Antonio.Caycedo@Kingstonhsc.ca.
Sunil PatelDepartment of surgery, Queen's University and Kingston General Hospital, Kingston K7L 2V7, Ontario, Canada.
Shaila MerchantDepartment of surgery, Queen's University and Kingston General Hospital, Kingston K7L 2V7, Ontario, Canada.
Carl BrownDepartment of Surgery, University of British Columbia and St. Paul Hospital, Vancouver V6Z 1Y6, British Columbia, Canada.
Queen's University · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of new surgical techniques and technologies has traditionally been unregulated. In many settings surgeons frequently adopt novel procedures without following a structured program of implementation or supervision. The appearance of innovative technology played a pivotal role in the advancement of new surgical techniques during the industrial revolution. Innovation has been an essential component of surgical development, which led to contemporary surgical techniques such as minimally invasive surgery. Different initiatives have been developed to guide the safe introduction of new surgical techniques and other procedures. Those include comprehensive concepts such as the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term study framework, which could be particularly relevant when reflecting on the novel transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME), introduced a decade ago. This relatively novel and complex procedure promised to overcome some of the major limitations of traditional surgical approaches for rectal cancer. According to the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term study framework, taTME is in the phase of exploration, where there is an existing and increasing number of reports being published as the experience grows. The current management of rectal cancer is in a state of radical evolution, with multiple options that were not previously available. TaTME is only one technique amongst many which could be part of a rectal cancer surgeon's armamentarium; however, it requires further rigorous study and evaluation.

Indexed as

InnovationNew technologyRectal cancerSafetyTransanal surgery

Identifiers

PMID32551026
PMCPMC7289648
OpenAlexW3029662631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.