Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32550975›Full record

ArticleRO-MAN ... : the ... IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication : proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication2019

Towards securing the sclera against patient involuntary head movement in robotic retinal surgery.

Ali Ebrahimi, Muller Urias, Niravkumar Patel, Changyan He, Russell H Taylor, Peter Gehlbach, Iulian Iordachita

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RO-MAN ... : the ... IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication : proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ali EbrahimiLaboratory for Computational Sensing and Robotics at the Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA.
Muller UriasWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA.
Niravkumar PatelLaboratory for Computational Sensing and Robotics at the Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA.
Changyan HeLaboratory for Computational Sensing and Robotics at the Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA.
Russell H TaylorLaboratory for Computational Sensing and Robotics at the Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA.
Peter GehlbachLaboratory for Computational Sensing and Robotics at the Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA.
Iulian IordachitaLaboratory for Computational Sensing and Robotics at the Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Hospital · USBeihang University · CN

Funding

Enabling Technology for Safe Robot-assisted Surgical MicromanipulationR01EB023943 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GEHLBACH, PETER LOUIS, IORDACHITA, IULIAN IOAN · 2017 to 2024
$2.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB023943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal surgery involves manipulating very delicate tissues within the confined area of eyeball. In such demanding practices, patient involuntary head movement might abruptly raise tool-to-eyeball interaction forces which would be detrimental to eye. This study is aimed at implementing different force control strategies and evaluating how they contribute to attaining sclera force safety while patient head drift is present. To simulate patient head movement, a piezoelectric-actuated linear stage is used to produce random motions in a single direction in random time intervals. Having an eye phantom attached to the linear stage then an experienced eye surgeon is asked to manipulate the eye and repeat a mock surgical task both with and without the assist of the Steady-Hand Eye Robot. For the freehand case, warning sounds were provided to the surgeon as auditory feedback to alert him about excessive slclra forces. For the robot-assisted experiments two variants of an adaptive sclera force control and a virtual fixture method were deployed to see how they can maintain eye safety under head drift circumstances. The results indicate that the developed robot control strategies are able to compensate for head drift and keep the sclera forces under safe levels as well as the free hand operation.

Identifiers

PMID32550975
PMCPMC7301640
OpenAlexW3000358628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.