Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32550960›Full record

ReviewApplied physics reviews2018

Cardiovascular tissue bioprinting: Physical and chemical processes.

James B Hu, Martin L Tomov, Jan W Buikema, Caressa Chen, Morteza Mahmoudi, Sean M Wu, Vahid Serpooshan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied physics reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. 3D Printing Approaches to Engineer Cardiac Tissue.Current cardiology reports · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James B HuStanford Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Jan W Buikema
Caressa ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois 60153, USA.
Morteza Mahmoudi
Sean M Wu
Vahid Serpooshan

Funding

Induced pluripotent stem cells in the understanding and treatment of heart diseaseU01HL099776 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LONGAKER, MICHAEL T, WU, JOSEPH C. · 2009 to 2015
$8.2M
Enabling Technologies for Human-Machine Hybrid TissuesDP1LM012179 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WU, SEAN M · 2014 to 2018
$3.8M
Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Neonatal Cardiac Development and RepairR00HL127295 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SERPOOSHAN, VAHID · 2018 to 2020
$729k
NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL127295NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL099776NLM NIH HHS DP1 LM012179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) cardiac tissue bioprinting occupies a critical crossroads position between the fields of materials engineering, cardiovascular biology, 3D printing, and rational organ replacement design. This complex area of research therefore requires expertise from all those disciplines and it poses some unique considerations that must be accounted for. One of the chief hurdles is that there is a relatively limited systematic organization of the physical and chemical characteristics of bioinks that would make them applicable to cardiac bioprinting. This is of great significance, as heart tissue is functionally complex and the

Identifiers

PMID32550960
PMCPMC7187889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.