Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32550858›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2020

Chemical risk and safety awareness, perception, and practices among research laboratories workers in Italy.

Rosa Papadopoli, Carmelo Giuseppe Angelo Nobile, Alessandro Trovato, Claudia Pileggi, Maria Pavia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Unveiling Urinary Mutagenicity by the Ames Test for Occupational Risk Assessment: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rosa PapadopoliDepartment of Health Sciences, Medical School, University of Catanzaro "Magna Græcia", Via T. Campanella, 115, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Carmelo Giuseppe Angelo NobileDepartment of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Science, University of Calabria, Arcavacata di Rende, 87036 Cosenza, Italy.
Alessandro TrovatoDepartment of Health Sciences, Medical School, University of Catanzaro "Magna Græcia", Via T. Campanella, 115, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Claudia PileggiDepartment of Health Sciences, Medical School, University of Catanzaro "Magna Græcia", Via T. Campanella, 115, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6288-5540
Maria PaviaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via L. Armanni, 5, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Magna Graecia University · ITUniversity of Calabria · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionExposure to chemical compounds occur

methodsThe survey was conducted among research laboratories workers who were exposed to chemical substances during their activity. Subjects completed a questionnaire exploring knowledge, attitudes and behaviors related to chemical hazards involved in research activities.

resultsEnrolled subjects were 237, for an 81.7% response rate. More than 90 hazardous chemical substances were used in the surveyed laboratories. A correct knowledge on hazardous chemicals was significantly more likely in younger researchers, in those manipulating a higher number of hazardous chemicals, and in those with a higher number of years of training in the attended laboratory; 54.4% of the workers said they felt very exposed to chemical risk. Correct practices in the laboratories were significantly more likely in researchers who perceived to have a low exposure to chemicals, but a high exposure to biological risk, who agreed with the statement that colleagues handle chemicals following safety procedures and who perceived to have received an adequate training in the management of accidents and first aid.

conclusionsOur results showed significant gaps in knowledge and scarce preparedness in the adherence to safety processes to prevent and contain risks related to use of chemical compounds in research laboratories.

Indexed as

CancerogenicChemical hazardsChemical riskMutagenicOccupational exposureSafe handlingToxic

Identifiers

PMID32550858
PMCPMC7298783
OpenAlexW3034275809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.