Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32550854›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP

Validation of the Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction Questionnaire in adults with a same-sex partner.

Cristóbal Calvillo, María Del Mar Sánchez-Fuentes, Tesifón Parrón-Carreño, Juan Carlos Sierra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Measurement Invariance across Sexual Orientation for Measures of Sexual Attitudes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Associations between Relationship Status, Anxiety, Sexual Function, and Sexual Satisfaction in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual People.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Validation of the Orgasm Rating Scale in Context of Sexual Relationships of Gay and Lesbian Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Sexual desire and its relationship with subjective orgasm experience.International journal of impotence research · 2022
    Article
  20. Association of Sexual Attitudes with Sexual Function: General vs. Specific Attitudes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cristóbal CalvilloMind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
María Del Mar Sánchez-FuentesFaculty of Social and Human Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Teruel, Spain.
Tesifón Parrón-CarreñoDepartament of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, Universidad de Almería, Spain.
Juan Carlos SierraMind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction Questionnaire (IEMSSQ) is one of the few instruments that has been developed from a theoretical model and assess sexual satisfaction. In addition, it has been successfully validated in Spanish heterosexual population. The objective of this study is to adapt and examine its psychometric properties (reliability, evidence of validity, and measurement invariance across sexual orientation and sex) in gay people in a relationship.

methodA sample of 1,820 adults, of whom 50% are gay people and 55% men, answered the Spanish version of the IEMSSQ. In addition, subjects with gay orientation answered the Massachusetts General Hospital-Sexual Functioning Questionnaire and the Dyadic Adjustment Scale.

resultsWhen comparing by sex and sexual orientation, the IEMSSQ has a strict invariant structure. Its reliability is good, and the evidence of construct and concurrent validity is adequate. However, the components of equality are moderate.

conclusionsThe IEMSSQ makes it possible to compare the sexual satisfaction between gay/heterosexual men and women, presenting good psychometric properties in gay people, constituting an useful instrument in the clinical and research field.

Indexed as

IEMSSQinstrumental studypsychometric propertiessame-sex couplesSexual satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID32550854
PMCPMC7296249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.