Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32550646›Full record

ArticleFuture healthcare journal2020

Improving the quality of discharge summaries through a direct feedback system.

Charles H Earnshaw, Amanda Pedersen, Jo Evans, Tina Cross, Olivier Gaillemin, Arturo Vilches-Moraga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future healthcare journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Didactic Instruction's Impact on Medicolegal Quality of Radiation Oncology Resident Physician Documentation.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Benefits, limits, and risks of ChatGPT in medicine.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Improving the quality of inpatient discharge summaries.The International journal of risk & safety in medicine · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Discharge communication.Future healthcare journal · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Charles H EarnshawSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
Amanda PedersenSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
Jo EvansSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
Tina CrossSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
Olivier GailleminSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
Arturo Vilches-MoragaSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is a recognised need to improve the quality of discharge documentation to facilitate the safe and effective ongoing care of patients once they leave hospital. Previous studies have focused on individual interventions, such as teaching or feedback. Our continuous quality improvement project aims to improve the quality of discharge documentation at our hospital by providing a comprehensive overhaul of the education and feedback around discharge documentation.

methodsWe designed a comprehensive data analysis tool to analyse the performance of our discharge summaries. We presented at clinical governance sessions and arranged numerous teaching sessions for junior doctors. We developed a live-feedback system based on the content of a sample set of the previous month's summaries, which included poster-based feedback and group teaching.

resultsOur interventions have significantly improved the quality of our discharge documentation across a broad range of categories, including the summary of the stay, actions for general practitioners and information given to patients in lay terminology.

conclusionOur comprehensive quality improvement project has improved the quality of our discharge documentation. Further work aims to expand this project into a regional setting, as well as designing a strategy to maintain engagement of key stakeholders to ensure continued progress.

Indexed as

care transitioncommunicationdischarge summaryquality improvementSafety

Identifiers

PMID32550646
PMCPMC7296566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.