Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32550546›Full record

ArticleGene: X2019

Codon usage pattern and predicted gene expression in

Satyabrata Sahoo, Shib Sankar Das, Ria Rakshit

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gene: X, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dicodon-based measures for modeling gene expression.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Analysis of codon usage patterns in open reading frame 4 of hepatitis E viruses.Beni-Suef University journal of basic and applied sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Codon usage bias.Molecular biology reports · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Satyabrata SahooDepartment of Physics, Dhruba Chand Halder College, Dakshin Barasat, South 24 Parganas, W.B., India.
Shib Sankar DasDepartment of Mathematics, Uluberia College, Uluberia, Howrah, W.B., India.
Ria RakshitDepartment of Botany, Baruipur College, South 24 Parganas, W.B., India.
Yahoo (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extensive research for predicting highly expressed genes in plant genome sequences has been going on for decades. The codon usage pattern of genes in

Indexed as

Arabidopsis thalianaCAICAI, Codon adaptation indexCodon usage biasCP, Chloroplast Pltd CPGC contentGene expressionGEO, Gene Expression OmnibusMADS, Minichromosome maintenance1, Agamous, Deficiens and Serum response factorMBP, Megabase pairMRCBS, Score of Modified relative codon biasMT, MitochondrionPHE genesPHE, Predicted Highly ExpressedRCA, Relative Codon AdaptationRCB, Relative codon biasRCBS, Relative Codon Bias StrengthRMA, Relative Molecular AbundanceRP, Ribosomal proteinSAGE, Serial Analysis of Gene ExpressionTAIR, The Arabidopsis Information Resourses

Identifiers

PMID32550546
PMCPMC7286098
OpenAlexW2921995809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.