ArticleContraception: X2020
Using Google Ads to recruit and retain a cohort considering abortion in the United States.
Article in Contraception: X, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Imposters, Bots, and Other Threats to Data Integrity in Online Research: Scoping Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Best Practices.Online journal of public health informatics · 2025Review
- Spatial Analyses of Crisis Pregnancy Centers and Abortion Facilities in the United States, 2021 (Pre-Dobbs): Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2024Article
- Fear of procedure and pain in individuals considering abortion: A qualitative study.Patient education and counseling · 2023Article
- Google Trends on Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Searches in the United States From 2010 to 2021: Infodemiology Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2022Article
- Association Between Distance to an Abortion Facility and Abortion or Pregnancy Outcome Among a Prospective Cohort of People Seeking Abortion Online.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Alerting consciences to reduce cybercrime: a quasi-experimental design using warning banners.Journal of experimental criminology · 2022Article
- Article
- Real-Time Effects of Payer Restrictions on Reproductive Healthcare: A Qualitative Analysis of Cost-Related Barriers and Their Consequences among U.S. Abortion Seekers on Reddit.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Article
- Comparison of Facebook, Google Ads, and Reddit for the Recruitment of People Who Considered but Did Not Obtain Abortion Care in the United States: Cross-sectional Survey.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- Pregnancy outcomes after exposure to crisis pregnancy centers among an abortion-seeking sample recruited online.PloS one · 2021Article
- Using online technologies to improve diversity and inclusion in cognitive interviews with young people.BMC medical research methodology · 2020Article
- Separating Procedure-related Fears From Future Fertility Concerns Among a Cohort Seeking Abortion Information Online.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's HealthArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective was to develop and test the feasibility of a methodology to recruit and retain individuals in the United States (US) who were considering abortion at the point of searching for an abortion clinic. STUDY
designWe conducted the Google Ads Abortion Access Study, a national cohort study using a novel recruitment method - recruiting people searching for abortion care on Google. Advertisements for the study were displayed in search results. Users who clicked on the advertisement were directed to a landing page explaining the study and then to a screening form. Participants were eligible if they reported being pregnant and considering abortion. They completed an online baseline survey and 4 weeks later were invited by email or text message to complete a follow-up survey.
resultsOver the course of 8 months, we recruited a racially/ethnically and geographically diverse cohort considering an abortion using Google Ads. After removing fraudulent cases, we recruited 1706 respondents, and among these, 1464 (86%) provided contact information for follow-up. Among those providing contact information, 1005 completed the follow-up survey, resulting in a 69% follow-up rate. Older age, white race, higher education, difficulty meeting basic needs, being not religious/spiritual and having no previous births were associated with higher follow-up. Total cost of the ads was $31.99 per completed baseline + follow-up survey.
conclusionResearchers can use online advertising to successfully recruit populations early in their abortion-seeking process to understand the barriers they face and how to improve abortion access. Disadvantages include high cost and a small potential for fraudulent data. IMPLICATIONS: Google Ads is a feasible tool to recruit and follow a diverse sample of individuals who are considering abortion for studies investigating the barriers they face in obtaining a wanted abortion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.