ArticleContraception: X2020
Health insurance coverage and contraceptive use at the state level: findings from the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.
Article in Contraception: X, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of perinatal depression and postpartum contraception intent, choice, and actual use.Contraception · 2024Trial
- Socioeconomic Inequities in Pap Test Use Among Black Women in the United States: An Intersectional Approach.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
- Trends in Continuation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Among Adolescents Receiving Medicaid.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2024Article
- Neighborhood-level racialized socioeconomic deprivation and contraceptive use in the United States, 2011-2019.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2024Article
- Modern Contraceptive Use of National Health Insurance Participants before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic in South Kalimantan, Indonesia: Using Data from the Official Website of the National Population and Family Planning Agency.Acta medica Philippina · 2024Article
- Socioeconomic Inequalities and Factors Associated with the Use of Modern Contraceptive Methods in Women of Childbearing Age in Ecuador, 2018.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Health insurance and contraceptive use, Indonesian Family Planning Census 2021.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2023Article
- Understanding contraceptive failure: an analysis of qualitative narratives.Women's reproductive health (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2023Article
- Pathways to reproductive autonomy: Using path analysis to predict family planning outcomes in the United States.Health & social care in the community · 2022Article
- Review of Publicly Available State Policies for Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Device Reimbursement.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2022Article
- Medicaid and moms: the potential impact of extending medicaid coverage to mothers for 1 year after delivery.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022Review
- Associations between unfulfilled contraceptive preferences due to cost and low-income patients' access to and experiences of contraceptive care in the United States, 2015-2019.Contraception: X · 2022Article
- A Prospective Cohort Study of Changes in Access to Contraceptive Care and Use Two Years after Iowa Medicaid Coverage Restrictions at Abortion-Providing Facilities Went into Effect.Population research and policy review · 2022Article
- Use of contraception among reproductive-aged women in the United States, 2014 and 2016.F&S reports · 2020Article
- Impacts of Medicaid Expansion on Contraceptive Use Among Women in Neighborhoods of Racialized Socioeconomic Deprivation in the United States.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's HealthArticle
- From Detroit to Kansas City: Adapting the WE CARE Model to Improve Maternal and Infant Health.Health equityArticle
- Trends in Postpartum Contraceptive Use in 20 U.S. States and Jurisdictions: The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 2015-2018.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's HealthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine associations between health insurance coverage, income level and contraceptive use - overall and most/moderately effective method use - among women ages 18-44 at risk of pregnancy, within and across 41 United States jurisdictions in 2017. STUDY
designUsing data from the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, we calculated the proportions of women using any contraceptive method and using a most or moderately effective method for each state/territory and across all jurisdictions, categorized by health insurance coverage and income groups. For both contraceptive use outcomes, we ran simple and multivariable logistic regression models to test for significant differences in outcomes between insured and uninsured individuals.
resultsAcross jurisdictions, compared to uninsured women, those who had health care coverage had higher levels of contraceptive use (65% versus 59%; p < .001) and most/moderately effective contraceptive use (43% compared to 35%; p < .001); low-income women with coverage also had higher levels of contraceptive use (64% versus 61%; p < .05) and most or moderately effective contraceptive use (42% versus 36%; p < .01) than their uninsured counterparts. Controlling for individual-level demographic characteristics, health insurance coverage was associated with increased odds of most or moderately effective contraceptive use across jurisdictions (adjusted odds ratio = 1.33, p < .01). In 11 states, insured women had significantly higher odds of at least one contraceptive use metric than their uninsured counterparts.
conclusionsVariation in contraceptive use across the states likely reflects broader demographic, social and structural differences across state and local populations. States' political will and support around contraceptive access likely play a role in individuals' ability to obtain and use contraception. IMPLICATIONS: Our key finding that insurance coverage is significantly associated with use of most/moderately effective contraceptive methods across the states but not any contraceptive use underscores the importance of health insurance in aiding access to methods that are more costly and often require a visit to a health care provider.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.