ArticleContraception: X2019
Do young men's reports of hormonal and long-acting contraceptive method use match their female partner's reports?
Article in Contraception: X, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends in U.S. adolescent sexual behavior and contraceptive use, 2006-2019.Contraception: X · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess whether young men's reports of hormonal and long-acting contraceptive methods match their female partner's reports. STUDY
designWe analyzed a sample of 1096 heterosexual couples (aged 18-26) from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health Romantic Pair subsample. We compared male and female partner reports of hormonal/long-acting method use using class of method (hormonal/long-acting) rather than type (e.g., intrauterine device). Regression analyses linked men's reports of individual and relationship characteristics with alignment of reporting.
resultsSixteen percent of young men reported hormonal/long-acting method use at last sex differently than their female partner, that is, had a mismatched report. Men who had fewer lifetime sexual partners, had greater relationship satisfaction, believed their partner was monogamous and had a matched report of condom use at last sex were more likely to match their partner's report of hormonal/long-acting contraceptive use. Men living with children (from either partner) were less likely to have a matched report. Hispanic men were more likely to have a matched report than black men.
conclusionsMen are an increasingly important part of pregnancy prevention efforts. Pregnancy prevention and healthy relationship programs that incorporate communication skills may also indirectly improve young men's knowledge of their partner's contraceptive use and engagement in contraceptive decision making. IMPLICATIONS: Analyses showed that nearly two thirds of the 16% of young men that did not accurately report their partner's hormonal/long-acting method use at last sex underreport method use. Men at increased risk of misreporting may benefit the most from targeted pregnancy prevention programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.