Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32550330›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of surgery2019

Retrospective evaluation of candidemic patients among general surgery department in a tertiary care university hospital.

Uğur Önal, Dilek Yeşim Metin, Can Karaca, Süleyha Hilmioğlu Polat, Sinan Ersin, Meltem Işıkgöz Taşbakan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Overview on the Infections Related to RarePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Uğur ÖnalDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ege University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.
Dilek Yeşim MetinDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Ege University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.
Can KaracaDepartment of General Surgery, İzmir Economics University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.
Süleyha Hilmioğlu PolatDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Ege University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.
Sinan ErsinDepartment of General Surgery, Ege University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.
Meltem Işıkgöz TaşbakanDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ege University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.
Ege University · TRİzmir University of Economics · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCandida species are among the most important causes of hospital acquired blood borne infections, and with high rates of mortality and morbidity, these infections are still a major problem today. History of gastrointestinal surgery, administration of total parenteral nutrition and/or wide spectrum antibiotics and immune suppression following organ transplantations are considered serious risk factors for these infections. This study aimed to evaluate the patients from our general surgery department with diagnosed candidemia; by means of strain, treatment and prognosis. MATERIAL AND

methodsPatients with positive blood cultures for Candida species who were treated in the wards and Ege University Faculty of Medicine general surgery department of surgical intensive care units of our between 2012 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed by means of strain, treatment and prognosis.

resultsA total of 50 patients were enrolled in the study. Mean age was 58.96 years and 54% of the patients were female. There were nine patients with organ transplantation (four liver and five kidney transplantations), six with intestinal perforation and three with anastomotic leakage. Isolated strains were Candida albicans (36%; 18/50), Candida tropicalis (14%; 7/50), Candida glabrata (12%; 6/50), Candida parapsilosis (8%; 4/50), Candida kefyr (6%; 3/50), Candida krusei (4%; 2/50), Candida pulcherrima (2%; 1/50), Cryptococcus neoformans (2%, 1/50), Geotrichum capitatum (2%, 1/50), Candida spp. (unidentified, 14%; 7/50) with decreasing frequency. The highest antifungal sensitivity rates (> 90%) were measured for amphotericin B, voriconazole and echinocandins among all isolates. One-month mortality rate was 43.4% (20/46). Documented eradication was achieved among 24 of the 33 patients who had control blood culture samples (72.7%), and mean eradication time was 7.6 days. Echocardiography was performed in 14% (7/50) and ophthalmic examination in 8% (4/50).

conclusionAlthough C. albicans appears to be the dominant strain in patients with candidemia, frequencies of other strains are increasing. Early diagnosis and treatment of patients with candidemia is of vital importance due to high mortality and morbidity rates.

Indexed as

Candidemiaprognosisrisk factorstreatment

Identifiers

PMID32550330
PMCPMC6795230
OpenAlexW2978416774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.