ArticleFuture healthcare journal2020
Reducing hospital mortality: Incremental change informed by structured mortality review is effective.
Article in Future healthcare journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postpandemic Recovery of Case Mix Index and Risk-Adjusted Mortality in US Hospitals.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- There has never been a more important time to think about our future healthcare.Future healthcare journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hospital mortality rates have frequently been improved by identifying diagnostic groups with high mortality and targeting interventions to those specific groups. We found that high residual inpatient mortality persisted after targeted measures had achieved an initial reduction, and that the causes were spread across a wide range of diagnostic groups. Further interventions were put in place consisting of a structured electronic mortality form and systematised mortality scrutiny and reporting (primary intervention) accompanied by a number of quality improvement interventions arising from the mortality analysis (secondary interventions). We found that those interventions were associated with progressive improvements in mortality rates and average lengths of inpatient stay over the 5-year study period. Winter quarter mortality improvements reached a high level of statistical significance but could not be attributed to changes in any particular diagnostic groups. We conclude that progress with mortality improvements is probably best achieved by applying both code-targeted and general interventions simultaneously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.