ArticleFuture healthcare journal2020
Evaluation of training programmes mapped to the new internal medicine curriculum.
Article in Future healthcare journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scotland's internal medicine simulation strategy: A 5-year journey.Future healthcare journal · 2024Article
- 'A Unique opportunity to test things out': a qualitative study of broad-based training in Scotland.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Pandemic times: Learning well in a time of COVID-19.Future healthcare journal · 2020Article
- There has never been a more important time to think about our future healthcare.Future healthcare journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In preparation for the internal medicine training (IMT) programme introduced in 2019, the core medical training (CMT) programme in London was made 'IMT-ready' in 2018 by creating new rotations that reflected the compulsory requirements of the first 2 years of the IMT curriculum, including provision of the requisite number of critical care placements. Core medical trainees completed posts within the 'IMT-ready' programme between August 2018 and August 2019, during which time the trainee experience was evaluated. A total of 497 responses were received. Of these, 96% of trainees were on an 'acute unselected take' on-call rota, 79% were able to attend outpatient clinics, 80% had the opportunity to practise procedural skills and 88% had the opportunity to apply palliative care skills. Clear areas for improvement were identified that predominantly focused on the need to optimise trainee attendance of outpatient clinics and the number of patients seen during an acute take. With respect to future career intentions, only 63% of trainees planned on applying to a group 1 (with general medicine) higher medical specialty. Thematic analysis of trainees in critical care placements highlighted an appreciation of the level of senior support, feeling well integrated into the team, a positive experience of induction and excellent opportunities for performing procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.